Posted by: steveg
Re: shoe is on the other foot - 01/24/13 11:59 AM
Hmmm. How 'bout that, eh?
Posted by: lanovami
Re: shoe is on the other foot - 01/24/13 01:48 PM
So fetuses are people with souls, but no rights except the right to life, except in cases of negligence.. I'm sorry, father, could you run that by me again?
Posted by: carp
Re: shoe is on the other foot - 01/25/13 06:21 PM
Humm
I'm sorry, father, could you run that by me again?
Since its a Catholic hospital <- call it the (Will of God) sue him instead <- I would not.
This strucked me is kinda odd ?
less than an hour after she entered the emergency room, Lori Hodghill and the twins she was carrying died.
She was there for little less than an hour , so they could have and gone in and saved the twins <-- it's NOT abortion -> the twins would be 2 months premature thats savable ?
This poor man lost his entire family in one day - reminds me of that Indian guy in Scotland and yes another (Catholic hospital) where the fetus was having severer complications and died , the parents urged them to abort to save the mothers life and they stalled until she died as well.
Posted by: MrB
Re: shoe is on the other foot - 01/26/13 01:16 AM
Tragic, but from this link, I don't know much about what really occurred.
Of course, the purpose of the linked blog was to bring attention to the defense's reason for denying payment.
I think they could have used other reasons.
Dave
Posted by: carp
Re: shoe is on the other foot - 01/26/13 12:29 PM
Nothing to do with denying payment - rather with saving the twins lives, which they had time to do
Posted by: MrB
Re: shoe is on the other foot - 01/27/13 08:54 AM
My comment was about the lawyers defense strategy . As for the twins deaths, I don't know all the details. That's the reason for the law suit,I gather
Dave