No video? Really?

Posted by: yoyo52

No video? Really? - 09/14/13 10:42 AM



So very disappointed!
Posted by: Jim_

Re: No video? Really? - 09/14/13 07:58 PM

No Ami...

...nules? It's a travesty. There ought to be a law.
Posted by: lanovami

Re: No video? Really? - 09/14/13 10:55 PM

Heh. Ironic. Sometimes I just want to read about a new topic etc. but I go to a news link and too much of the time, most of the content is a video and I only get a little synopsis below or nothing at all. I don't want to go through a video in most cases, I want text to absorb for myself. Sadly, I think we will see more and more of this as people get more wired.
Posted by: Stumpy1

Re: No video? Really? - 09/15/13 04:41 AM

Quote:
No Ami...

...nules? It's a travesty.


laugh laugh laugh
Posted by: NucleusG4

Re: No video? Really? - 09/15/13 06:10 AM

It's bogus anyways. I saw it and one can clearly see it's only a Bigfoot.
Posted by: NucleusG4

Re: No video? Really? - 09/15/13 06:12 AM

But if you must....

Posted by: NucleusG4

Re: No video? Really? - 09/15/13 06:15 AM

Disappointed?

Apparently you are not the only one.
This pair of boobs woman feels the same way.

Posted by: NucleusG4

Re: No video? Really? - 09/15/13 06:50 AM

OK.. it's official. I fell off the edge of the internet today...




Posted by: yoyo52

Re: No video? Really? - 09/15/13 08:19 AM

Who knew!
Posted by: Jim_

Re: No video? Really? - 09/15/13 10:31 AM

Wooly Ami...

...nule

http://www.livescience.com/18394-woolly-mammoth-video-siberia.html
Posted by: DLC

Re: No video? Really? - 09/15/13 10:57 AM

I'm so glad they found this because it justifies Texas putting Creationism into public school science books.... hey, if Mammoths are still alive, then it's plausible that early man could have roamed with Dinosaurs !! QED !! whistle