I always wondered why? [ur=http://www.newscientist.com/news/news.jsp?id=ns99993807]This theory can explain.[/url] However I still can get my head around why do we still have hair (on the head), pubic hair, etc. If it's evolutionary advategous to have less hair why didn't we loose it all?<br><br>
_________________________ Check out my sites on ads and design.
Give it another couple of million years, and people will be completely bald and hairless all over.<br><br>Why do you think aliens in those old movies are always bald with pointy heads?<br><br><br>[color:red]DaddyMac's MP3 to AAC conversion: left to go...</font color=red>
Sexual markers aren't necessarily an evolutionary advantage--witness the peacock, whose big ol' tail probably costs more energy and lives than not. There's just no accounting for sexual preferences, though. So, so long as a chest full of manly hair turns 'em on . . . .<br><br><br><br>Great wits are sure to madness near allied.--John Dryden, "Absalom and Achitophel"
_________________________ MACTECHubi dolor ibi digitus
Xplain's use of MacNews, AppleCentral and AppleExpo are not affiliated with Apple, Inc. MacTech is a registered trademark of Xplain Corporation. AppleCentral, MacNews, Xplain, "The journal of Apple technology", Apple Expo, Explain It, MacDev, MacDev-1, THINK Reference, NetProfessional, MacTech Central, MacTech Domains, MacForge, and the MacTutorMan are trademarks or service marks of Xplain Corp. Sprocket is a registered trademark of eSprocket Corp. Other trademarks and copyrights appearing in this printing or software remain the property of their respective holders.
All contents are Copyright 1984-2010 by Xplain Corporation. All rights reserved. Theme designed by Icreon.