I thought the NYT had an article in the past 4-6 weeks that disputed much of that "evidence"- that it was in part about the video and more spontaneous, and the report given by someone who was supposedly there (or in the region) wasn't valid... (can't remember specifics).
On a 2nd note, how many of the terrorists attacks under GW were preventable, incl 9-11... not saying it was totally preventable, but parts could have been if he , Dickie boy, and Rice Krispie had been paying attention !
NOT to mention one of the worst in Beirut in 1983 that killed 241 servicemen under Reagan !! WHAT did Reagan do to retaliate ? He withdrew !! Oh the mighty Reagan -struck out !
To answer your question Steve - they CAN'T get vaccinated !! They ARE the virus !!
#610394 - 01/15/1407:34 PMRe: The Anti-Hillary Pill?
[Re: DLC]
steveg
Making a new reply.
Registered: 04/19/02
Posts: 27495
Loc: D'OHio
The previous article debunked the concept that this was Al Qaeda getting under our radar and not the controversial video and that the WH lied and covered up facts so as to not imperil the election.
This is about alleged miscommunication and poor management by the State Dept.
'Nudder woids… Nebbermind that Socialist Muslim Appeaser in the oval Office. It's that Presumed-2016 Nominee-Clinton-Woman's fault.
See where the right will take this? And don't worry, within a week, the Fox intellecterati will inform us that Bridghazi is a distraction to take the heat off Benghazi.
Well they can whine all they want; every President has had some deaths on their watch and ANY one can argue they could have done a better job - comes with da territory !