yoyo52 Nothing comes of nothing.
Registered: 05/25/01
Posts: 30520
Loc: PA, USA
I think the religious argument is equally bogus. If it holds up, the religions that think medicine in general is bad, or like the Jehovah's Witnesses, think that there should be no blood transfusions, could sue to withhold such treatments, also on religious grounds. It's up t the insured, not to the insurer, to determine what they wish to use.
_________________________ MACTECHubi dolor ibi digitus
I am sick and tired of the religious zealots and TP kooks ... they are NOT using the birth control, so don't PUSH your beliefs on everyone else who wants to !!
These companies are NOT a religious group... hell many religious groups are not religious groups but political opportunists !! Gimme a break.
WHO is to say when an egg and a sperm become a "person" ? NO ONE can prove when ! "At conception" is too simplistic and there's NO SUPPORTING DATA !! NO ONE has SUPPORTING DATA !! so let it be a personal choice !
Crude.. and not true. If that is all you think a man is good for.. well.. whatever. Up to that point.. what has the woman invested? One egg that would have been flushed down the toilet on a sanitary napkin.
when all else fails fall back on the ego lol so it's your speck o' sperm ...and your chattel to carry it? we have NO SAY in the matter of being FORCED into carrying as many of your little specks as suits your ego?
one egg and all the minerals and vitamins leached out of her body, the back aches and morning sickness, possible loss of life
yoyo52 Nothing comes of nothing.
Registered: 05/25/01
Posts: 30520
Loc: PA, USA
I hate to get into this, but you're not reading Nuc's post. He says, "Up to that point." One single cell is much like another single cell. That's not to say that I disagree with bird's chart (although I'd hate to take it as literally as you seem to be: since men don't have ovaries, there ought to be no male oncologists studying ovarian cancer?)
_________________________ MACTECHubi dolor ibi digitus
Previous Topic
Index
