• AppleCentral Network:
  • Tech Support
  • |
  • Open Source
  • |
  • Apple News
  • |
  • Register Domains
  • |
  • SSL Certificates
  • |
  • iPod Deals
  • |
  • Mac Deals
  • |
  • Mac Book Shelf
  • AppleCentral Home
  • MacTech Magazine
    • About MacTech in Print
    • Issue Table of Contents
    • Subscribe
    • Risk Free Sample
    • Back Issues
    • MacTech DVD
    • MacTech Archives
    • MacTech Print Archives
    • MacMod
    • MacTutor
    • FrameWorks
    • develop
  • MacNews.com
    • MacNews News
    • Blog
    • MacTech Reviews and KoolTools
    • Whitepapers, Screencasts, Videos and Books
    • News Scanner
    • Rumors Scanner
    • Documentation Scanner
  • Apple Expo
    • by Category
    • by Company
    • by Product
  • MacForge.net
  • Job Board
  • Advertising
    • Benefits of MacTech
    • Mechanicals and Submission
    • Dates and Deadlines
    • Submit Apple Expo Entry
  • User
    • Register for Ongoing Raffles
    • Register new user
    • Edit User Settings
    • Logout
  • Contact
    • Customer Service
    • Webmaster Feedback
    • Submit News or PR
    • Suggest an article
  • Connect Tools
    • MacTech Live Podcast
    • RSS Feeds
    • Twitter
You are not logged in. [Log In] AppleCentral » Forums » General Discussion » Soapbox » Data mining
Register User    Forum List        Active Topics    FAQ
Page 6 of 7 < 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 >
Topic Options
Hop to:
#596314 - 06/11/13 02:59 PM Re: Data mining [Re: steveg]
six_of_one Offline
Pool Bar

Registered: 04/19/02
Posts: 4474
Loc: Alexandria, VA
When it comes to abuse of people, my concerns are that: a) by the time something becomes evident to the average Joe it'll be too late or too ingrained ("what's the big deal? This has been going on for years") to roll-back; and b) the incremental erosion of Constitutional rights becomes so subtle -- we can live with a little infringement here and a little erosion there -- that one day we may wake to realize we effectively have very few of them left ...

One of the most interesting and essential aspects about the American Experiment we've been running for the past couple centuries is the balance between freedom and security: what risks we're willing to accept in exchange for the freedoms we enjoy. What's good about these recent various leaks is they have increased awareness, at least a little bit, about how that balance has become skewed, and is continuing to skew, towards a less-free state in favor of a attempt to provide "100% security." (Some would suggest that it's far less about actual security and far more about government amassing power and control, but I'll leave that for another post ;-) ... In the best of all worlds this would lead to a real national discussion on where that balance should truly lie -- in today's low-information/high entertainment distraction environment, I have my doubts as to wether that discussion will really take place ...

Another aspect of the US experiment is the question of how far to trust the government in a system developed pretty much explicitly on the notion that governments cannot be trusted. On a practical level there of course has to be a certain amount of trust or the system won't work at all. But "just trust us, safeguards are in place and everything's fine" is pretty much as anti-American an attitude as you can get.

Are these recent revelations enough to motivate the populace to demand accountability from their government and to demand a restoration of lost liberties and rights? Or are we on an inexorable path where the populace is apathetic enough in their relative comfort and distraction -- or alternatively, in their dealing with the increasing wealth imbalance and just trying to make ends meet -- to not really care?

Top
#596315 - 06/11/13 03:21 PM Re: Data mining [Re: six_of_one]
steveg Offline
Making a new reply.

Registered: 04/19/02
Posts: 27495
Loc: D'OHio
Well, the risks of today are quite a bit more extreme than when this American Experiment began. And in turn security is a different animal today than it was back then. Not that we — as a people — should become desensitized to the shift in the balance of privacy and security, but context and the reality of the global political environment can't be ignored either.

I think exposure/awareness and the resulting debate are important — especially for the long term. But I still think there are short term issues that need to be dealt with now so they're out of the way and can't distract from the long term. Right now, it's flipped, and we're letting a broader and more future-centric issue distract us from things that need to be and can be fixed now. Jobs and economic wellness today, please — and accountability a wee bit later and permanently thereafter.
_________________________

Top
#596322 - 06/11/13 04:07 PM Re: Data mining [Re: steveg]
garyW Offline
mid-century modern

Registered: 04/19/02
Posts: 8329
Originally Posted By: steveg
Well, the risks of today are quite a bit more extreme than when this American Experiment began.


Bill Maher summed it up last Friday: when the Framers of the Constitution limited government intrusion for privacy rights, security considerations did not include nukes. When an entire city can be obliterated in seconds, an archive of metadata for reference to connect the dots and prevent such a thing seems like a national security necessity they might have considered.

_________________________



Top
#596325 - 06/11/13 05:21 PM Re: Data mining [Re: garyW]
steveg Offline
Making a new reply.

Registered: 04/19/02
Posts: 27495
Loc: D'OHio
That's pretty much my point. While there has to be a national discussion, and a better way to use the tools, I can live with "It sucks a little less than root canal."
_________________________

Top
#596327 - 06/11/13 06:50 PM Re: Data mining [Re: six_of_one]
Celandine Offline
Madame Flutterbye

Registered: 01/18/04
Posts: 19508
Loc: SopranoLand
Originally Posted By: six_of_one
When it comes to abuse of people, my concerns are that: a) by the time something becomes evident to the average Joe it'll be too late or too ingrained ("what's the big deal? This has been going on for years") to roll-back; and b) the incremental erosion of Constitutional rights becomes so subtle -- we can live with a little infringement here and a little erosion there -- that one day we may wake to realize we effectively have very few of them left ...
Another aspect of the US experiment is the question of how far to trust the government in a system developed pretty much explicitly on the notion that governments cannot be trusted. On a practical level there of course has to be a certain amount of trust or the system won't work at all. But "just trust us, safeguards are in place and everything's fine" is pretty much as anti-American an attitude as you can get.
<snip>
Or are we on an inexorable path where the populace is apathetic enough in their relative comfort and distraction -- or alternatively, in their dealing with the increasing wealth imbalance and just trying to make ends meet -- to not really care?


<--kliker
_________________________

____


Top
#596329 - 06/11/13 08:10 PM Re: Data mining [Re: garyW]
six_of_one Offline
Pool Bar

Registered: 04/19/02
Posts: 4474
Loc: Alexandria, VA
Originally Posted By: garyW
Bill Maher summed it up last Friday: when the Framers of the Constitution limited government intrusion for privacy rights, security considerations did not include nukes. When an entire city can be obliterated in seconds, an archive of metadata for reference to connect the dots and prevent such a thing seems like a national security necessity they might have considered.

The logical conclusion of that line of reasoning is that a free and open society is less and less possible in the face of increasing weapons technology: Think of a worst-case possible scenario and eliminate rights and freedoms in order to prepare for it -- as technology and capability increase, rights and freedoms decrease.

Yes, some bad people could set off a nuke somewhere. The question is how likely is that really? And to what extent are we willing to sacrifice rights and liberties to reduce (note I didn't say eliminate) that possibility, even if (as I suspect) it's rather low to begin with?

Obviously if we want to retain a semblance of what this society has been based upon, there's a balance to be struck between those ideals and the security environment that surrounds us. The question is where is that balance and where do we draw that line? And as technology and weapons capability advance, how do we prevent ourselves changing inexorably from a freedom-oriented state to one solely focused on security?

Top
#596330 - 06/11/13 08:24 PM Re: Data mining [Re: six_of_one]
yoyo52 Offline
Nothing comes of nothing.

Registered: 05/25/01
Posts: 30520
Loc: PA, USA
That was the justification for Big Brother's regime, as I recall. Perpetual war calls for perpetual nosiness.
_________________________
MACTECH ubi dolor ibi digitus

Top
#596336 - 06/11/13 10:00 PM Re: Data mining [Re: yoyo52]
garyW Offline
mid-century modern

Registered: 04/19/02
Posts: 8329

There are many taking sides in this debate that collection of metadata is the tryannical Big Brother regime. (These people need to get a grip.) I've heard a half-dozen pundits on TV just today claiming Obama is using this metadata to attack his political enemies. Most of these very loud idiots consider Obama the enemy of the nation … and so it goes.
_________________________



Top
#596341 - 06/11/13 10:41 PM Re: Data mining [Re: garyW]
yoyo52 Offline
Nothing comes of nothing.

Registered: 05/25/01
Posts: 30520
Loc: PA, USA
I am not saying that Obama, or Bush back in the day for that matter, uses the data for any nefarious reason. But heaped up data will fester, I can almost guarantee it..
_________________________
MACTECH ubi dolor ibi digitus

Top
#596342 - 06/11/13 10:57 PM Re: Data mining [Re: six_of_one]
Celandine Offline
Madame Flutterbye

Registered: 01/18/04
Posts: 19508
Loc: SopranoLand

Funny...
This same discussion came up once before...
...when the question of 'citizens allowing their
bags to be rifled-through in Sub-Way Stations'...

Some member claimed they'd allow it in exchange
for the assurance "...that there wouldn't a bomb
under the seat in front of them"

My remark at the time was, "I'll take my chances!"
I still stand behind that remark.


..and so it goes.
~ Kurt Vonegut Jr.
_________________________

____


Top
Page 6 of 7 < 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 >
Previous Topic
View All Topics Index
Next Topic

Tweet

Preview

Moderator:  Acumowchek, MacGizmo, Moderator, neil, Reboot 
Print Topic
Switch to Threaded Mode
Publications, Articles and Industry Discussion
   »MacTech/MacNews Article Discussions
   »Apple World
Marketplace
   »Deals and Special Offers
      »Expired Offers
   »Trading Warehouse
Mac
   »Hardware
   »Software
   »Servers, Security, and Networking
   »Programming, Web Dev & Scripting
   »Windows and Virtualization
   »Cloud and Online Services
Mobile Technologies
   »iPhone Apps, AppStore, and iTunes
   »iPad, iPhone, iPod and Apple TV Hardware
Mods and Hacks
   »General Mods
      »Techniques
      »Miscellaneous
      »Mod Logs
   »Laptop Mods
      »Case Mods
      »Hardware Mods
      »Misc. Mods
   »Desktop Mods
      »Case Mods
      »Hardware Mods
      »Misc. Mods
   »Peripheral Mods
      »iPod Mods
      »Misc Mods
   »Software Hacks & Mods
General Discussion
   »Site Feedback & Issues
   »Stan's Lounge
   »Soapbox
Now Software Support
   »Announcements
   »Now X
      »FAQs
      »Discussion
   »Now Up-to-Date & Contact
      »Community Help
      »Tips and tricks
View profile
Send a PM
Add to your Watched Users
View posts
View profile
Send a PM
View homepage
Add to your Watched Users
View posts
View profile
Send a PM
Add to your Watched Users
View posts
View profile
Send a PM
View homepage
Add to your Watched Users
View posts
View profile
Send a PM
Add to your Watched Users
View posts
View profile
Send a PM
Add to your Watched Users
View posts
View profile
Send a PM
Add to your Watched Users
View posts
View profile
Send a PM
Add to your Watched Users
View posts
View profile
Send a PM
Add to your Watched Users
View posts
View profile
Send a PM
Add to your Watched Users
View posts
Board Rules · Mark all read
Contact Us · AppleCentral · Top

MacTech Only Search:
Community Search:

 
 
 

 
 
 
 
 
  • SPREAD THE WORD:
  • Slashdot
  • Digg
  • Del.icio.us
  • Reddit
  • Newsvine
  • Generate a short URL for this page:



AppleCentral. www.applecentral.com
Main office: 805-494-9797
Xplain's use of MacNews, AppleCentral and AppleExpo are not affiliated with Apple, Inc. MacTech is a registered trademark of Xplain Corporation. AppleCentral, MacNews, Xplain, "The journal of Apple technology", Apple Expo, Explain It, MacDev, MacDev-1, THINK Reference, NetProfessional, MacTech Central, MacTech Domains, MacForge, and the MacTutorMan are trademarks or service marks of Xplain Corp. Sprocket is a registered trademark of eSprocket Corp. Other trademarks and copyrights appearing in this printing or software remain the property of their respective holders.
All contents are Copyright 1984-2010 by Xplain Corporation. All rights reserved. Theme designed by Icreon.
Generated in 0.046 seconds in which 0.028 seconds were spent on a total of 13 queries. Zlib compression enabled.
Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.5.8