Holder has misunderstood the law - the test for self defence as a defence to murder is not whether surrender by the victim was "offered" but whether shooting him in the head was in excess of reasonable force. That's a question for the Pakinstani Criminal Courts or, if there's a failure to prosecute, the ICC.
KM needs to team up with Momaar Ghadaffi they would make the perfect couple named the ODD Couple.Either he is really spiteful or plain ignorant what happened with OBL.
IMO the intent, the mission of the seal team was to kill.
Based on what?
=== I don't think it really matters if there were 24 Seals or 100. They were dealing with someone who likes to blow people up.... All he had to do was act like he had something in his hand or nearby.... and that would have been enough.
Well he's just a "righteous _____________" - always has to be right (in his own mind). There's a noun that goes with this phrase but I don't want to get personal. I don't think he's a bad person, just greatly misguided, . . or has nothing to live for but arguments !
I don't agree with that... if the soldiers shot bin Laden dead when they could have arrested him they''d be guilty of an offence. That's obviously for a court of law.
No wonder you are worked up... with writing like this...
Quote:
The hero, fully equipped, pumped up, is face to face with the real Osama bin Laden, unarmed, just out of bed, trapped in a drab room. There's no possible escape; the whole compound is "secured". This is it - the moment America has been dreaming about since September 11, 2001.
trapped in a drab room..
WTF has the room being drab have anything to do with anything? except try to make us feel sorry for OBL.. that he had to "hide" from us in squalor....
I agree with kat that it looks that way but agree with you that it's not for us to make assumptions.... so can we all agree that this whole business should be decided in a court of law?
Previous Topic
Index
