Nah, in the great big outside world the discrimination argument is all but lost. What goes on in a handful of States is neither here nor there to be honest - in England one of those same sex unions wouldn't be recognised as marriage in any event no matter where it happened to be registered.
km
Nah, my great big outside world is taking baby steps. I welcome what is going on in some States and countries.
My marriage is recognized in my country, to be honest, that is what really matters to me.
It wasn't that many years ago that England did not recognize civil partnerships; marriage will be next. All change has a beginning, be patient.
It wasn't that many years ago that England did not recognize civil partnerships; marriage will be next
No marriage over here has to be a consummated union of one man and one woman.
km
For now, but like I said, it has only been recently that England recognized same sex civil unions-so good on ya for that one. Marriage is just around the corner and very soon all these conversations will be buried in a load of codswallop.
Consider the legitimacy of a marriage between two disabled people who love each other very much, even though sex and children are an impossibility. By the standards that KM establishes, this couple ~ oh, and yes, they're straight ~ not only don't have a legitimate marriage, but never had the right to even assume that their love for each other was enough.
No sex = No Children = No legitimate avenue to marriage.
Man, that's even more bizarro that what probably goes on inside his HineyNess' closet.
_________________________ I always deserve it. Really.
Previous Topic
Index
