Wrong - sorry

We already see what happens - protesters take that crap outside.
Media can give them fair coverage , without them disrupting someone else right to their free speech.

Except, they arrested people for protesting outside a closed event (Tampa, FL). GW and gang simply did not want anyone to see any opposition.

Still don't buy into that.

Protest all you want so long it does not trample someone elses rights and do it legally so you don't get arrested.

There is absolutely no point in discussing anything with you, is there? The people who were arrested in Tampa were on public property outside the event venue and were not disrupting the event. The "charges" were later dropped after three days. There is a difference between expressing yourself in a civil manner on public propery and purposefully disrupting or interfering with someone else's rights.

See, this is where I fall off the ACLU wagon. For the sake of ~ Common fn' sense says nobody has the right to pull the kind of hateful crap these batshlt crazies pull at friggin' funerals. I'd be more than happy to shove their right to free speech up their collective lunatic ass.

And don't start that "where do you draw the line" crap. I'll come back with yellin' fires in theaters, hate speech and seriously? Those don't even matter. This shlt is just plain wrong. No. They do not have any right on the face of the planet to do what they plan. Or what they've done in the past.

None. End of rant.

Right Lea - I agree and you see my point.

People like Michael will protest right in the dead girls face - after all funerals is a public space.

This is a question of is it (morally correct) -vs- constitution.
The constitution may say you have the right but morally you are dead wrong.

Are you f'n kidding me?
Do you even think before you type?
You have turned to be such a colossal prick. Get a job and get a life.

Yeah I admit I went to far - sorry Michael

However people who feel they can thread on others makes me sick to no ends and to declare they have a right makes that even worse.

I'll ask again, no one tackled my question...

if we have no gun regulation, WHERE do we draw the line ?
DO we allow automatic weapons ? extended clips? what's the limit (if any)?
Many claim we can't regulate guns , so what do we do ?
What do we do to keep guns from "crazys" and criminals ?

We do have gun regulation. The line gets drawn by the law. And that line, like the law, gets challenged and changed on a regular basis. But ~ We do have gun regulation. And still, there is nothing on the planet we can do to keep guns away from lunatics and criminals.

It's an issue that's automatic Liberal/Conservative Red Meat. Both parties foam at the mouth over this one.

Common sense says pass sensible laws and leave it at that. Oh, wait. I think I've identified the problem ~ Common sense. Neither side exhibits any.

Say goodnight, Lea. Goodnight, Lea.