Their rationales sound as fragmented as any platforms they develop for, though.
Quote:
A majority of developers believe Google's Android operating system -- not Apple's iOS -- will be the dominant platform in the future to power everything from smartphones to touch-screen refrigerators, according to a survey released today.
While independent software writers are enthusiastic about creating apps for Apple's iOS mobile operating system, and see it as the most financially viable platform now, they view Android as the long-term winner in terms of market share.
Seventy-two percent of developers say Android "is best positioned to power a large number and variety of connected devices in the future" -- while only 25 percent said iOS will rule the new device world, according to a survey of nearly 2,400 app developers from around the world conducted by Mountain View-based Appcelerator, which makes software development tools, and research firm IDC.
Nearly 56 percent of developers said they favored Android's long-term outlook as a platform for them to make money, while 37 percent picked iOS, the Apple mobile operating system that runs the iPhone, iPod touch and iPad tablet.
By the end of this year, Google's Android smartphone operating system is expected to leapfrog competing mobile systems, including Apple's, Research In Motion's and Microsoft's Windows in global popularity, according to a recent Gartner report. The first Android tablet, the Samsung Tab, will be launched soon on all four major U.S. wireless carriers: Verizon, AT&T, Sprint and T-Mobile. Other companies are expected to follow with their own Android tablets, flooding the market now dominated by the iPad.
"It's a forward-looking perspective," said Scott Schwarzhoff, Appcelerator's vice president of marketing. "Developers are building a business. So they have to place bets. It means dollars and cents to them. They look at all the factors and say, 'Well, how long can this horse really ride?' "
By a wide margin, Android is considered the most open platform, even after Apple recently revised its developer agreement to provide more transparency to its app approval process and opened up iOS to third-party development tools.
"The reason this is a problem for Apple is, you will see Android embedded on devices beyond the smartphone -- tablets, connected TVs, conference systems like Cisco's TelePresence, stereos, refrigerators, automobiles," Schwarzhoff said. "How many devices could benefit from the Android operating system? The answer is: a lot. It is the next-generation operating system."
At present, though, developers view Apple's devices as the biggest business opportunity. Seventy-six percent said iOS presents the best moneymaking opportunities, while 19 percent chose Android; 88 percent said Apple has the best app store, while only 10 percent said that of Android. Ninety-one percent said they were "very interested" in creating apps for iOS gadgets, while 82 percent chose Android smartphones.
Apple's rigid platform gives developers a consistent software road map across all the gadgets -- and, presumably, future iOS devices. The wide-open Android operating system, on the other hand, will reside an a variety of devices, each with its own requirements that demand different specs. And that is a concern for developers, Schwarzhoff said.
Seventy-four percent of developer respondents said iOS was the "least fragmented" platform, while only 11 percent described Android as such.
The biggest risk for Android is developers could eventually view it as a "fragmented mess," Schwarzhoff said.
"It's not all happy trails for Google here," he said. "Apple does things for a reason."
Am I missing something here in the comparison of the iPhone and Android? There is a small difference.
One is a phone. One is software. Can I have a WTF moment?
Apple has an iPhone (hardware) and software which they control very tightly.
Google has Android which is software. No phone. Google does not make a phone. I could be wrong.
So there is a competition of sorts but the playing field is somewhat skewed and apples are being compared to oranges. I love competition and I hope Apple is confronted with a lot of it since competition begets cool stuff but this is just weird.
This could be the battle between two for the fight to control the operating system of the future internet. Apple seems to have a leg up since they are making a hardware as well as an operating system solution.
By making the hardware and the software they can simply make it all more simple. 17 flavors of Android is not simple.
Am I missing something? Microsoft has become an also ran because they don't control the hardware. Is google following those footsteps?
carp
Dino's are Babe magnets
Registered: 04/19/02
Posts: 27018
Loc: Hawaii
Google like MS did come out with phones but later dropped them due to poor sales. Well like Apple someone else made their phones. However MS makes money licensing Win7 Mobile, not sure what Android money is seems to be free mobile OS for anyone or maybe Android is licensed just open?
What? Oh, "make". Sure someone makes them. No one makes stuff anymore. But Apple designs every single chip and molecule of plastic in their phones. That is what I mean by "make."
They have control over every chip inside the phone as well as all the software that goes on board. That is the big deal. Google does not have that. They wish, so does Microsoft, but you snooze you lose.
carp
Dino's are Babe magnets
Registered: 04/19/02
Posts: 27018
Loc: Hawaii
True that Apple has way more control, more important Apple knows how to industrial design.
Did you see that MS phone, yiikes even looks like a MS design. Google phone I believe was just a rebranded HTC phone.
The real reason for people that Android will pole vault ahead of Apple. You can get Android on just about any brand and on just about any service provider with different styles of phones. Thats about 20 more options than Apple only one provider and only one phone.
The real reason for people that Android will pole vault ahead of Apple. You can get Android on just about any brand and on just about any service provider with different styles of phones. Thats about 20 more options than Apple only one provider and only one phone.
I kind of doubt that. Apple seems to be very focused on making a phone that will be working when you pull it out of your pocket. Because they own the hardware and the software they can make sure the battery is charged and the phone does not have to be rebooted. As the internet incorporation into these phones becomes more intense (we have only scratched the surface) this control over both the hardware and software will become more and more important. It is a phone first and must work.
The 20 Android options will be superficial modding in comparison to what Apple will be able to do. Apple will eventually be on other service providers besides ATT if they need to. Right now they do not need to.
The only way that Apple could possibly screw this pooch is if they take things for granted. That someone takes an iPhone out of their pocket on a subway three years from now and the only thought you have is "what a sucker paying twice as much for a hobbled phone with no features." As long as Steve Jobs draws breath that is unlikely to happen.