Well, if the Canadian parliament suddenly legislated that black was white i'd still choose black from the colour palette... rather than finishing up with the wrong colour in my artwork by taking any notice of such an eccentric and wrong assertion.
There's no social inequality in marriage by the way because there's no inquiry into a person's sexuality. I've made that point several times before - do you acknowledge it or not?
km
Originally Posted By: keymaker
It was your expression so what did you mean by it?
km
No, social inequality was your expression - see above - so, define social inequality. Are you OK?
Well, you're on one level of understanding, to do with overall numbers, I was using the term in its more usual sense of women as a minority in positions of power and influence. What's the ratio of men to women in Congress? Do you understand now, or is it still elusive?
#531936 - 08/07/1003:18 PMRe: So... have I missed anything?
[Re: keymaker]
steveg
Making a new reply.
Registered: 04/19/02
Posts: 25840
Loc: D'OHio
I asked you if you still consider women a minority. The number of women in Congress has nothing to do with what I asked you. Besides, the ratio of women in positions of leadership — in the public and private sectors — has grown geometrically, and the salary gap is beginning to close at a faster clip, too. Still not nearly fast enough, but better than before.
Trying to put words in my mouth is not a very good way to dodge a direct question. But I'm sure you'll keep trying.
Previous Topic
Index
