What expert opinion, that I don't agree with the interpretation you present? Your post makes no sense.

I am not disagreeing with you about deflection. I'm not suggesting hang BP and everyone else go about your business. I'm saying hang BP because they are the evil villain here, since it's their well, their lack of planning, their lack of oversight of their own subcontractors. Force them out of business, and make it excruciatingly clear the same will happen to anyone else.

No that's wishful thinking in my opinion - too big.


Oh yeah, by letting them off the hook - that makes sense.

km

That's rather presumptuous don't you think? Considering that's a question to be determined by the court upon consideration of all the evidence? Obviously the court will be deciding what was reasonable with regard to the circumstances prevailing at the time not with the benefit of hindsight and just one side of the argument - like you seem to be doing.

km

What expert opinion? Your expert opinion that BP should be run out of business because they are at fault. You act as if you know what happened on the rig and why it failed. That would be jumping to a conclusion, one that big oil wants you to jump to.

You think putting BP out of business would solve anything? BP employs more than 80,000 people worldwide. Putting them out of business is going to solve what exactly? How to keep us in a recession. That would be solved.

You're jumping to conclusions and coming up with ridiculous solutions to a problem you don't know anything about. That expert opinion.