Gotta agree here. If you guys are nailing yourselves on the cross of supposedly ignoring KM, responding to what you think he might have said via secondary quotations from other posters is almost as much of a circle-jerk as the rest of these threads.
Either ignore him or don't. Trying to have it both ways just makes you look like you have no self control ;-)
I would only disagree with the "almost". It is ten times more the circle jerk when one ...
shiit, I have no idea how to describe these train-wrecks and am surprised that Max is sucked into them as echo filler.
Absolutely and the circle jerk is complete. Never said I wasn't part of it. The ones who don' think they are part of the problem are the funniest. Not sure what I am although assuredly part of the problem and so I bow out of this one. I got self-control. HAHAHA. As if.
Proud MacBabe. Happy everything to everybody.
Loc: B.C. Canada
are you guys that clueless? I was just correcting a few of his misconceptions. I'd didn't say you'd wish to, I said you need to.
No, you keep saying that but it's wrong. No BP are calling more of the shots now because of the retrospective legislation twist. No I'd say the point is valid. I don't agree with that, old chum. No, wrong. No, I think you're being a bit vindictive there, especially after all he's done to support the victims. No I don't agree with that.
The above is a snippet of your replies in this post only. It is all so negative or belligerent. How unfortunate.
Um... a bit off the mark, six. I can choose to ignore his posts and still participate in the thread and respond to posts that may or may not be related to anything that he's posted. And if it does, that's hardly having it both ways. If I had no self-control, I'd be chasing his crap up and down these threads — kinda like you are.
Loc: Alexandria, VA
I can choose to ignore his posts and still participate in the thread and respond to posts that may or may not be related to anything that he's posted. And if it does, that's hardly having it both ways.
Well, if you're supposedly ignoring KM, and ironically crowing about the fact as you indirectly reply to something he's written, then what you just described is pretty much the definition of having things both ways. But really, I couldn't care less if you really plan on actually ignoring KM or not. I just find it amusing that you guys can't seem to go cold turkey on him.
As for me, this will be my sixth post in a 128-reply thread, two of which actually agree with KM ... not exactly "chasing" him up and down these threads. Plus, I'm not the one bragging to the whole board about how wonderful the Ignore button is while seemingly incapable of actually using it to effect ...
Xplain's use of MacNews, AppleCentral and AppleExpo are not affiliated with Apple, Inc. MacTech is a registered trademark of Xplain Corporation. AppleCentral, MacNews, Xplain, "The journal of Apple technology", Apple Expo, Explain It, MacDev, MacDev-1, THINK Reference, NetProfessional, MacTech Central, MacTech Domains, MacForge, and the MacTutorMan are trademarks or service marks of Xplain Corp. Sprocket is a registered trademark of eSprocket Corp. Other trademarks and copyrights appearing in this printing or software remain the property of their respective holders.
All contents are Copyright 1984-2010 by Xplain Corporation. All rights reserved. Theme designed by Icreon.