Well, that was constructive. Do you get nosebleeds way up there on that horse of yours?
No, no I don't. Because I do not lead and start threads to ban forum members nor do I popularize the concept of using the "ignore " button to ban forum members nor do I suggest that forum members leave for ten years.
So no, no nosebleeds from this high perch. The fact that the people who think they are going to ignore a member have the self control of an infant and thus cannot possibly do that as shown a hundred times in the past and the barrister will continually taunt them because they can't. not. post. the. last. word. is comical.
Comical as it is I will take the advice and take the ten years off. Or not. I am a jackass so I can change my mind if this place becomes fun again. Then I will have to come back and poke a stick in.
Slow couple of days for you, Paul? Or is it just time for you to remind us that you're the on-sabbatical thinker of lofty thoughts. Or are you just programmed to drop by and treat us to a bottle of whine every dandy now and then, and preach about how we should express ourselves in a manner suitable to you.
For someone who's so busy accusing others of trying to run the forum, you're doing one heckuvajob, Brownie, of telling everyone what they should post. A. wee. bit. hypocritical. dontcha. think?
Because I do not lead and start threads to ban forum members
Banning? I will step into your knee deep crap now, explain that one.
That is an outright lie.
No, Mr. moderator, you need not get your knickers in a twist. I was not talking of outright banning like you are talking of an outright lie. I am talking about the soapbox in the past few months leading up to the last few weeks of one or two people who are pushing to ban a member because of their views. Their views are not agreeable so there is a nonstop personal attacking of the person. You want me to draw a picture? Threads started only to ridicule a member or to advocate "ignoring" them? Banning in the sense of "no one wants you here and I took a poll and no one wants you here so please leave" type of banning.
We all have our ways of expressing our views, Paul. And believe it or not, they may not follow your own idea of how to express oneself. Even those who debate on the issues alone eventually walk away in frustration. And if you lurk enough to come riding in on your high horse to lecture us, you know why they walk away. Me? I call a schmuck a schmuck. Much more efficient, IMHO.
Like I said. No good to nail his ass when it needs nailing, but no good to say the hell with him, either. Make up your mind.
Xplain's use of MacNews, AppleCentral and AppleExpo are not affiliated with Apple, Inc. MacTech is a registered trademark of Xplain Corporation. AppleCentral, MacNews, Xplain, "The journal of Apple technology", Apple Expo, Explain It, MacDev, MacDev-1, THINK Reference, NetProfessional, MacTech Central, MacTech Domains, MacForge, and the MacTutorMan are trademarks or service marks of Xplain Corp. Sprocket is a registered trademark of eSprocket Corp. Other trademarks and copyrights appearing in this printing or software remain the property of their respective holders.
All contents are Copyright 1984-2010 by Xplain Corporation. All rights reserved. Theme designed by Icreon.