Not really... the shareholders are protected by limited liability so if BP goes down it's out of your control and you can kiss goodbye to your precious retrospective penalties.
steveg
Making a new reply.
Registered: 04/19/02
Posts: 27429
Loc: D'OHio
In other words, you don't give a flying flip about the impact to the people, the ecosystem, and the economy of the region. Please tell me again about your sociopathic disorder that you call stoicism.
And tell me when we might be able to kiss you goodbye.
"BP is reported to be funnelling about 6,000 barrels of oil per day from Deepwater Horizon following the initial qualified success of its top hat emergency containment procedure.
And we know this isn't true. If it were, you'd certainly link to corroborating material to back up the claim. I'm not interested in any pointless circle jerk about whether you have or haven't backed up your statements in the past.
You made the above statement. Or you made up the above statement.
Oh, please ~ I have to laugh at myself that I even bother, because ~
xxxxxxxxxx
(A heart-felt thank you to the peep that made the above possible. You know who you are. And, no it's not Steve, for those of you that might care to guess. )
_________________________ I always deserve it. Really.
No, I was just explaining out how limited liability works... investors are only liable to the value of their shares... when the money runs out, that's it.
"You mean you hope it isn't true... but unfortunately for you, it is"
Seriously? You think I'd rather win an argument with you than see British Petroleum finally make some kind of dent in the nightmare they've brought to my country? That's your game, not mine.
WTF ever.
_________________________ I always deserve it. Really.
)
Previous Topic
Index
