#489380 - 01/15/1003:46 PMRe: You can not beat this logic...
[Re: keymaker]
steveg
Making a new reply.
Registered: 04/19/02
Posts: 25067
Loc: D'OHio
According to whom? You? That's a laugh riot.
You insist you're neither bigot nor homophobe, yet you can't help but blow your cover over and over again with statements like that.
But, in the spirit of fairness and civility, I'll give you a choice. But first, a little background. Allow me the assumption that you and Mrs. km are happily married, are very much in love with each other, and have wonderful children. Yet you find it objectionable that same-sex couples might enjoy the same happiness and legal status, and that couples of any sexual orientation might be able to have children, too, if medical/scientific intervention of some sort is required to reach that goal.
Civil unions are good enough for Gay and Lesbian couples, and couples engaging in IVF in order to raise a family are selfish and lifestyle-centric — according to you.
So, back to your choice. I can continue to assert that you are a bigot and a homophobe, or instead, I can say that you are incredibly selfish, insensitive, and intolerant. Either way, the sum is "not a very nice man." But perhaps the language of the latter is more palatable for you than the former. So, by all means, pick tour poison.
#489391 - 01/15/1004:51 PMRe: You can not beat this logic...
[Re: steveg]
keymaker
I invented modding!
Registered: 12/14/07
Posts: 5984
Quote:
According to whom? You?
Noope, the majority of Californians... as opposed to the bigoted heterophobic minority that you belong to. It's about time you started showing some humility over the issue.
Quote:
You insist you're neither bigot nor homophobe, yet you can't help but blow your cover over and over again with statements like that.
There you go again... statements of fact make no one homophobic... nauseating sexual innuendo and lies of the kind you throw around do.
Quote:
you find it objectionable that same-sex couples might enjoy the same happiness and legal status,
Too many false assumptions. If changing the meaning of marriage against the wishes of society is the only way a person can be happy he needs to see a psychologist. As it happens your assumptions are incorrect.
Quote:
and that couples of any sexual orientation might be able to have children, too, if medical/scientific intervention of some sort is required to reach that goal.
Well that's dangerous so it shouldn't be allowed.
Quote:
Civil unions are good enough for Gay and Lesbian couples
Not good enough - better.
Quote:
and couples engaging in IVF in order to raise a family are selfish and lifestyle-centric — according to you.
Not necessarily... they could be ill-informed.
Quote:
So, back to your choice. I can continue to assert that you are a bigot and a homophobe, or instead, I can say that you are incredibly selfish, insensitive, and intolerant.
I'd be more worried about a compliment from anyone as narcissistic and dogmatic as you clearly are.
Hard headed may be a better label than bigoted, but as far as heterophobic, okay, this explanation I would love to hear. I know what one is, but #1, through what reasoning you've decided to pin that label on this topic, and #2, does it refer to anyone here cuz I don't see it.