Well what you call a tenancy by the entirety can be achieved by deed and the right of survivorship applies to each tenant individually. I wasn't really arguing with you about marital rights however, just clearing up what you meant. Any such rights as are bestowed upon married couples as a unit would only apply to those qualified by marriage in any event.
You seem a bit vague about who's allowed and who's not allowed to marry
How so?
Well, with reference to Prop 8 you said that some people are denied the right to marry as if to suggest that sexual orientation is a criterion of marriage, when it's not.
If I turn up to compete in the Wimbledon mixed doubles with one my pals from the Hope & Anchor and I'm told the event requires team members to be of the opposite sex I don't say "Oy! I've been denied the right to compete in the mixed doubles" but simply accept that I didn't comply with rules. If I then go back with a lady partner - I'm in... and as it happens I'm pretty damn good at tennis.
#489268 - 01/15/1008:31 AMRe: You can not beat this logic...
[Re: Clark]
yoyo52 Nothing comes of nothing.
Registered: 05/25/01
Posts: 29861
Loc: PA, USA
See, Clark--you were right. And all the pussyfooting about underage and all the other crap was just smoke and mirrors.
I will bet you all the money in my pocket at this moment (and I promise that I'll give an accurate count ) that before long the discussion turns to inter-species sex and marriage.
_________________________ MACTECHubi dolor ibi digitus
all the pussyfooting about underage and all the other crap was just smoke and mirrors.
You need to start paying attention - steve introduced denial of the right to marriage which applies to age and prohibited degrees but not to sexuality. Unlike you I consider it polite to answer a person's questions instead trying to find excuses to run away from them.
) that before long the discussion turns to inter-species sex and marriage.
Previous Topic
Index
