• AppleCentral Network:
  • Tech Support
  • |
  • Open Source
  • |
  • Apple News
  • |
  • Register Domains
  • |
  • SSL Certificates
  • |
  • iPod Deals
  • |
  • Mac Deals
  • |
  • Mac Book Shelf
  • AppleCentral Home
  • MacTech Magazine
    • About MacTech in Print
    • Issue Table of Contents
    • Subscribe
    • Risk Free Sample
    • Back Issues
    • MacTech DVD
    • MacTech Archives
    • MacTech Print Archives
    • MacMod
    • MacTutor
    • FrameWorks
    • develop
  • MacNews.com
    • MacNews News
    • Blog
    • MacTech Reviews and KoolTools
    • Whitepapers, Screencasts, Videos and Books
    • News Scanner
    • Rumors Scanner
    • Documentation Scanner
  • Apple Expo
    • by Category
    • by Company
    • by Product
  • MacForge.net
  • Job Board
  • Advertising
    • Benefits of MacTech
    • Mechanicals and Submission
    • Dates and Deadlines
    • Submit Apple Expo Entry
  • User
    • Register for Ongoing Raffles
    • Register new user
    • Edit User Settings
    • Logout
  • Contact
    • Customer Service
    • Webmaster Feedback
    • Submit News or PR
    • Suggest an article
  • Connect Tools
    • MacTech Live Podcast
    • RSS Feeds
    • Twitter
You are not logged in. [Log In] AppleCentral » Forums » Mods and Hacks » Desktop Mods » Processors questions
Register User    Forum List        Active Topics    FAQ
Page 1 of 2 1 2 >
Topic Options
Hop to:
#485649 - 12/30/09 09:25 PM Processors questions
John Rougeux Offline
Member # -1

Registered: 11/06/08
Posts: 6095
Loc: Louisville, KY
So these are the 3 that I'm looking at. I'll probably scratch the 2.8ghz one as 2.66 seems just fine.

Comparing these 3 shows that there really isn't that much difference except in price, QPI , L2 cache, and Hyperthreading.

What is QPI?
Does L2 cache matter that much?
And what advantage is hyperthreading?


Click for full size

Click for full size

Top
#485796 - 12/31/09 02:41 AM Re: Processors questions [Re: John Rougeux]
Antonio Offline

NArF!

Registered: 06/01/05
Posts: 401
Loc: San Francisco, CA
The closer the cache is to the processor, the faster it moves. Essentially, cache stores data in the pipeline, sort of like having a batter in the box, it's faster getting the batter to the plate than moving him all the way from the dugout, plus he's warmed up and ready to go.

As closer cache (to the processor) moves more quickly, less is needed the closer it is. The combo they're using of L2 and L3 cache in the middle option is pretty damn good, IMHO.

I think the 2.66Ghz i7 is probably the best value here- you WANT hyperthreading. The quad core i7 processes eight threads simultaneously (think parallel computing... in addition to more processing cores, each core can complete two tasks at once instead of one). Also, for ten bucks more than the 2.88Ghz option, you're getting level 2 and level 3 cache, plus QPI for more memory bandwidth. (Okay, that's not all... it's a completely new way for the processor to talk to memory and other components) For an overall more robust computing experience, I'd definitely take that over the extra 1.34Ghz CPU speed. The only other concern may be wattage, if you're energy-conscious.

For the Gigabyte logic board, I lost my notes, but the model GA-P55M-UD2 or model GA-EX58-UD5 should work with either the i5 or i7.

This is a pretty good article on hyperthreading. Wikipedia has one as well.
Here's a good one on QPI.


Edited by Antonio (12/31/09 10:45 AM)
Edit Reason: added info
_________________________
“Creative ability is best displayed with the most basic tools."

Website Facebook Twitter House of Hackers

Top
#485865 - 12/31/09 11:06 AM Re: Processors questions [Re: Antonio]
Antonio Offline

NArF!

Registered: 06/01/05
Posts: 401
Loc: San Francisco, CA
Okay, so I updated with more complete info. This is what happens when I post between other stuff I'm doing...
_________________________
“Creative ability is best displayed with the most basic tools."

Website Facebook Twitter House of Hackers

Top
#485885 - 12/31/09 03:13 PM Re: Processors questions [Re: Antonio]
SgtBaxter Offline
F'n HO.P.A.®

Registered: 05/10/02
Posts: 5249
Loc: Hampstead, MD, USA
If you ask me, the best processor of the three is the i7 860, performance wise it's faster out of the box than the 920 and uses less power. Win-Win.

Plus the motherboards will cost less. Win-Win-Win.

Even though it doesn't use QPI like nehalem, it moves the PCI controller onto the processor die, so components like videocards talk directly with the CPU instead of going through the northbridge.
_________________________

Hey I'm an F'n Jerk!®
twitter.com/SgtBaxter
facebook.com/Bryan.Eckert

Top
#486335 - 01/02/10 06:35 PM Re: Processors questions [Re: SgtBaxter]
Antonio Offline

NArF!

Registered: 06/01/05
Posts: 401
Loc: San Francisco, CA
How will the motherboards cost less? This is a hackintosh, he wants to run OS X- he's going to be limited by what he can actually use, much more than by cost.

As for your assumption that the 860 is faster out of the box, it depends on what he intends to do with the machine (yeah, same old argument, but as you'll see at the linked test at the bottom, with a few caveats). There are many cases for which the 920 would be preferable, and it is an all-around superior platform to the 860, hands-down. As the prices are so close, even if he's only going to be doing everyday consumer-level stuff, it's still a better choice, because for the everyday stuff (word processing, iTunes stuff, etc, etc) there'd likely be no noticeable difference in performance and the prices are so close (so go for the better offering). If he wants to do things such as video encoding or heavy-lifting with Photoshop, the 920 will likely best the 860 by a decent margin.

Intel's Spec Stuff

Here is a good comparison, not just between these two processors, but alongside the i5, Core2 Quad, and AMD's offering (AMD... HAHAHA, whatever :oP ). Their tests would appear to reveal that the 920 is, per cycle, faster than the 860. However, they seem to prefer the i5 for overall value (price-to-performance ratio), and that may be something to consider.
_________________________
“Creative ability is best displayed with the most basic tools."

Website Facebook Twitter House of Hackers

Top
#486337 - 01/02/10 06:41 PM Re: Processors questions [Re: Antonio]
John Rougeux Offline
Member # -1

Registered: 11/06/08
Posts: 6095
Loc: Louisville, KY
I plan on using Photoshop CS4 and some light video editing (iMovie or Final Cut Express).

Top
#486341 - 01/02/10 06:49 PM Re: Processors questions [Re: John Rougeux]
Antonio Offline

NArF!

Registered: 06/01/05
Posts: 401
Loc: San Francisco, CA
What's interesting is that, per Intel's specs, the 920's bus speed completely swallows the 860's at nearly twice the speed, but this doesn't seem to reveal itself in the benchmarks.
_________________________
“Creative ability is best displayed with the most basic tools."

Website Facebook Twitter House of Hackers

Top
#486425 - 01/02/10 11:16 PM Re: Processors questions [Re: Antonio]
Antonio Offline

NArF!

Registered: 06/01/05
Posts: 401
Loc: San Francisco, CA
Another thing I'll mention, where I disagree with some of the benchmarks listed, is that I don't think those tests gave a fair estimate of the i7's hyperthreading capability. Hyperthreading is for multitasking, so that is when it is going to shine brightest.

It would be nice if someone, at some point, conducted some 'real world' testing, by maybe encoding some audio or video, while playing it back, while running a Photoshop filter.
_________________________
“Creative ability is best displayed with the most basic tools."

Website Facebook Twitter House of Hackers

Top
#487010 - 01/05/10 02:12 PM Re: Processors questions [Re: Antonio]
SgtBaxter Offline
F'n HO.P.A.®

Registered: 05/10/02
Posts: 5249
Loc: Hampstead, MD, USA
Originally Posted By: Antonio
How will the motherboards cost less? This is a hackintosh, he wants to run OS X- he's going to be limited by what he can actually use, much more than by cost.


LGA 1156 boards are generally cheaper than 1366 boards. Of course there are plenty of 1156 boards more expensive, all depends on what goodies are included.

As for tests, I've seen plenty of reviews showing the 860 is faster out of the box (notice I don't mention overclocking) than the 920, plus it's more energy efficient which is always a good thing. Of course, as you mention it's a hackintosh, so compatibility is more important, and the prices are going to be pretty close anyway. Hyperthreading is too overrated to even be a consideration IMO, but the

Also the 920's are being phased out, new chips are going the way of the 860's design.


Edited by SgtBaxter (01/05/10 02:18 PM)
_________________________

Hey I'm an F'n Jerk!®
twitter.com/SgtBaxter
facebook.com/Bryan.Eckert

Top
#487012 - 01/05/10 02:21 PM Re: Processors questions [Re: Antonio]
SgtBaxter Offline
F'n HO.P.A.®

Registered: 05/10/02
Posts: 5249
Loc: Hampstead, MD, USA
Originally Posted By: Antonio
What's interesting is that, per Intel's specs, the 920's bus speed completely swallows the 860's at nearly twice the speed, but this doesn't seem to reveal itself in the benchmarks.


Of course not, the 920 is talking to PCI and memory components through the northbridge, where the 860 bypasses the northbridge altogether as it's controllers are directly on the chip.
_________________________

Hey I'm an F'n Jerk!®
twitter.com/SgtBaxter
facebook.com/Bryan.Eckert

Top
Page 1 of 2 1 2 >
Previous Topic
View All Topics Index
Next Topic

Tweet

Preview

Moderator:  Acumowchek 
Print Topic
Switch to Threaded Mode
Publications, Articles and Industry Discussion
   »MacTech/MacNews Article Discussions
   »Apple World
Marketplace
   »Deals and Special Offers
      »Expired Offers
   »Trading Warehouse
Mac
   »Hardware
   »Software
   »Servers, Security, and Networking
   »Programming, Web Dev & Scripting
   »Windows and Virtualization
   »Cloud and Online Services
Mobile Technologies
   »iPhone Apps, AppStore, and iTunes
   »iPad, iPhone, iPod and Apple TV Hardware
Mods and Hacks
   »General Mods
      »Techniques
      »Miscellaneous
      »Mod Logs
   »Laptop Mods
      »Case Mods
      »Hardware Mods
      »Misc. Mods
   »Desktop Mods
      »Case Mods
      »Hardware Mods
      »Misc. Mods
   »Peripheral Mods
      »iPod Mods
      »Misc Mods
   »Software Hacks & Mods
General Discussion
   »Site Feedback & Issues
   »Stan's Lounge
   »Soapbox
Now Software Support
   »Announcements
   »Now X
      »FAQs
      »Discussion
   »Now Up-to-Date & Contact
      »Community Help
      »Tips and tricks
View profile
Send a PM
Add to your Watched Users
View posts
View profile
Send a PM
View homepage
Add to your Watched Users
View posts
View profile
Send a PM
View homepage
Add to your Watched Users
View posts
View profile
Send a PM
Add to your Watched Users
View posts
View profile
Send a PM
View homepage
Add to your Watched Users
View posts
View profile
Send a PM
Add to your Watched Users
View posts
View profile
Send a PM
View homepage
Add to your Watched Users
View posts
View profile
Send a PM
View homepage
Add to your Watched Users
View posts
View profile
Send a PM
Add to your Watched Users
View posts
View profile
Send a PM
Add to your Watched Users
View posts
Board Rules · Mark all read
Contact Us · AppleCentral · Top

MacTech Only Search:
Community Search:

 
 
 

 
 
 
 
 
  • SPREAD THE WORD:
  • Slashdot
  • Digg
  • Del.icio.us
  • Reddit
  • Newsvine
  • Generate a short URL for this page:



AppleCentral. www.applecentral.com
Main office: 805-494-9797
Xplain's use of MacNews, AppleCentral and AppleExpo are not affiliated with Apple, Inc. MacTech is a registered trademark of Xplain Corporation. AppleCentral, MacNews, Xplain, "The journal of Apple technology", Apple Expo, Explain It, MacDev, MacDev-1, THINK Reference, NetProfessional, MacTech Central, MacTech Domains, MacForge, and the MacTutorMan are trademarks or service marks of Xplain Corp. Sprocket is a registered trademark of eSprocket Corp. Other trademarks and copyrights appearing in this printing or software remain the property of their respective holders.
All contents are Copyright 1984-2010 by Xplain Corporation. All rights reserved. Theme designed by Icreon.
Generated in 0.052 seconds in which 0.027 seconds were spent on a total of 14 queries. Zlib compression enabled.
Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.5.8