It was not made a condition of his release - your own link says he dropped it himself
That's right he dropped it when he was told that there'd be no compassion if he didn't - which is where the blackmail came in.
Your link says nothing about that at all , your making that up .
Like I said if he continued his appeal he would have to stay in prison until the appeal process is over - which he could have died by then <-- that is NOT blackmail it is the law and he was smart to drop the appeal to get out much sooner under the compassion release
if he continued his appeal he would have to stay in prison until the appeal process is over
No, I'm afraid you're living in a bit of a fantasy world on that one - that was the decision but it wasn't required by law . It was made by executive order the terms of which were at the discretion of the minister. SMP Christine Grahame exposed the blackmail in the Independent on 12 August 2009 in which she stated: "I had received an email from a whistleblower in the Justice Department telling me that the Libyan officials were being told in no uncertain terms that he must drop his appeal or there would be no compassionate release". That was the blackmail and here is the law: s3 Prisoners and Criminal Proceedings (Scotland) Act 1993 <---.
Put down the tequila and see if you can fallow this:
You've been wrong all along (gee wot a surprize!)
You're just so used to your High School Bully BullSh!t that you just naturally thought that even that part of it would be meaningful the part where you tag someone as "Vickie Victim" thinking that alone would be enough to silence them into lying down and allowing you to take control of the situation.
I was... never was, nor will ever be "The VICTIM"... get it?
All I ever did ... and will CONTINUE To DO.. is DRAW ATTENTION TO YOUR BEHAVIOR For All To See to break your hold over the NEXT person you & Pee-Wee try to roll over and intimidate into leaving.
The reason why I initially contacted to MODERATOR is because (on any other forum) that's CORRECT PROCEDURE.
The reason I contacted mMod1 REPEATEDLY was because HE TOLD ME TO! He instructed that I TELL HIM WHENEVER I saw you (and Pee-Wee) make posts crafted to "push people's buttons" usually related to previous fights. (Example: Your lame protest above concerning EDITING)
Since he hadn't seen your previous rants against my admitted habit of editing MOST of my posts.. he'd wouldn't "get" that it was one of your "Button Pushers" so he told me to show them to him every time I came across one to show him what I was talking about.
AGAIN.. these are all trivial! Just a gad-fly... but it showed your pattern of typically crappy behavior.
ANYWAY: I decided the best way to go was Head-On Confrontation.
After all... why should YOU (and Pee-Wee) be the only ones having fun? What's good for the GOOSE & The GANDER should be OK for the rest of us as well.
Back to the point: I don't need the protection of anyone, never did, never will... I was never "The Victim" let alone "Vicky Victim"
YES I jumped in UNINVITED! LOLOLOL Like WHO INVITED YOU?!? YOU went after keymaker.. and I went after YOU for making the CONTENT EDITING Crack... get over it!
Xplain's use of MacNews, AppleCentral and AppleExpo are not affiliated with Apple, Inc. MacTech is a registered trademark of Xplain Corporation. AppleCentral, MacNews, Xplain, "The journal of Apple technology", Apple Expo, Explain It, MacDev, MacDev-1, THINK Reference, NetProfessional, MacTech Central, MacTech Domains, MacForge, and the MacTutorMan are trademarks or service marks of Xplain Corp. Sprocket is a registered trademark of eSprocket Corp. Other trademarks and copyrights appearing in this printing or software remain the property of their respective holders.
All contents are Copyright 1984-2010 by Xplain Corporation. All rights reserved. Theme designed by Icreon.