#422495 - 04/05/0905:01 AMRe: KM Bait Iowa court supports gay civil marriage
[Re: steveg]
lanovami
hours ahead of you
Registered: 05/02/05
Posts: 5694
Loc: 東京都
Let's get back to the real story. Iowa, man!
It's been projected that this trending pink development (after years of trending blue and red) is going to bring in millions of dollars. My favorite line from the article is: "Iowa basically has the Midwest to itself." Looks like Ioway has found itself in the fabled catbird seat.
_________________________ We are STILL what we repeatedly do - insists Aristotle
#422496 - 04/05/0905:07 AMRe: KM Bait Iowa court supports gay civil marriage
[Re: keymaker]
steveg
Making a new reply.
Registered: 04/19/02
Posts: 25066
Loc: D'OHio
Really? I'll dig up a few posts today (in between painting my new place) where I took back the remark. Or are you looking for some kind of official km-approved and notarized document?
Your obsession with with winning ancient and irrelevant arguments is bizarre. But I'll see if I can't accommodate you (sort of like helping a blind man off a bus).
#422532 - 04/05/0908:03 AMRe: KM Bait Iowa court supports gay civil marriage
[Re: keymaker]
yoyo52
Nothing comes of nothing.
Registered: 05/25/01
Posts: 28780
Loc: PA, USA
Originally Posted By: keymaker
Quote:
And you still haven't responded: do you as a matter of fact know that there has never been a law passed or a judicial judgment made without a grammatical error?
Yes, I did respond by pointing out that I had asked a question and not made a statement.
km
And in what you dismissed as overinterpretation because of course it's convenient for you to do so, I pointed out that your post had the grammatical form of a question but the rhetorical force of a statement. Legalistic weasel words all around.
_________________________ MACTECHubi dolor ibi digitus
#422539 - 04/05/0908:37 AMRe: KM Bait Iowa court supports gay civil marriage
[Re: keymaker]
yoyo52
Nothing comes of nothing.
Registered: 05/25/01
Posts: 28780
Loc: PA, USA
THe assertion in the form of a question was independent of the error. On the assumption that the error was in the judgment, you asserted, in the form of a question, that this was the only case of a grammatical solecism in such a judgment. Wiggle away.
_________________________ MACTECHubi dolor ibi digitus
Previous Topic
Index
