Thank you.


Oh dear, taking literally what was only a suggestion. If the statement is untrue let Society members refute it - otherwise it stands.

km

Well, even suggesting the reasons why people here may have taken there time responding is pretty silly given you really have no way of knowing other than your own projections ... I mean, what was the point, exactly?



I'll be happy to refute your statement: In my case the reason I took time to reply to your post was that I had better things to do, not because I had any qualms about what medical procedure should have priority over another ...

So there: your statement falls.

Oh please. One of the best defenses against MRSA is simple routine cleaning and disinfecting. Good God, you can reduce the occurrence of MRSA by just wiping door knobs and handrails with a good disinfectant. Thorough restroom cleaning. Autoclaving surgical instruments. Microfiber cleaning cloths and mops and systems...

You're telling me this is news in your part of the world? "Maybe you lot" need a Visa to come here to learn how to wash your hands! Yah, that's another preventive measure. Surprise!

You are soooooooooo reaching now.

Wow, talk about rabbiting on...

I've already explained the point. It was to suggest that infants dying from gastroschisis for want of dialysis machine and colonic cancer sufferers dying when they could be saved by simple procedures should be a higher priority than persons seeking lifestyle treatments out of the same fund.


The statement was that:

"everyone went very quiet after I posted that colonic cancer correspondence and mentioned that home-made infant dialysis machine... and I'll tell you why as well - because they don't want to admit that dealing with those problems should be a higher priority than IVF."

You can temporarily get away with claiming more important things to do but when you eventually come back in and waste time on evasive answers that skirt around the central issue it refutes nothing and the suggestion still stands - you don't want to admit that dealing with those problems should be a higher priority than IVF.

km

This is the thread that never ends,
it just goes on and on my friends
Some people started posting, not knowing what it was,
and they'll keep posting on and on and on and on because...

I've heard that those measures would only prevent 15 per cent of cases - is that wrong? Seems we could get infections down to 85,000 and deaths down to 4,250 by bringing in your pal. Our cleaners and managers aren't very good though... would he be able to provide training as well?

km

Then it's not funding usurped by IVF, but rather incompetence? Wow!

But hey, "my pal" would love to build a market in the UK. And you could be a hero!

Yeah, for the 15 per cent, something's gone wrong somewhere... I was thinking it could cost quite a lot of money to put right - you know, training, recruitment. I was wondering - do you think further research might be needed for the remaining 85 per cent?


Well I'm not in this for personal gain, you understand. Might I suggest that you contact the Ministry and put your proposals direct to Alan Johnson?

km

And to think ~ It all started out with a simple, autobiographical statement by the original poster.