#411327 - 01/29/0907:03 PMRe: To iPhone or not to iPhone?
[Re: John Rougeux]
Acumowchek Is this thing on?
Registered: 12/30/07
Posts: 4208
Loc: Petaluma, CA
Agreed on both counts. I'm lucky that my ISP has pretty much covered the Bay Area with wifi hot spots, but it would be nice to connect whenever, wherever I am. Is that what 3G would do? (I don't even own a cell phone! ) Oh well, they have to save something for future models, RIGHT?
#412286 - 02/03/0911:06 PMRe: To iPhone or not to iPhone?
[Re: RubenC]
carp
Dino's are Babe magnets
Registered: 04/19/02
Posts: 27021
Loc: Hawaii
Humm what you think ?
Maybe a 5 meg camera with a "flash" ? and built in video with audio Maybe 4G instead of the slower 3G , since Sprint already has that Maybe open to all providers since almost all have the copied visual voice mail feature Maybe uses the Boxee.TV enhance "flash" video tech built in
#412289 - 02/03/0911:14 PMRe: To iPhone or not to iPhone?
[Re: carp]
John Rougeux Member # -1
Registered: 11/06/08
Posts: 6095
Loc: Louisville, KY
Originally Posted By: carp
Humm what you think ?
Maybe a 5 meg camera with a "flash" ? and built in video with audio Maybe 4G instead of the slower 3G , since Sprint already has that Maybe open to all providers since almost all have the copied visual voice mail feature Maybe uses the Boxee.TV enhance "flash" video tech built in
I doubt 4G since they are with AT&T, not Sprint. I doubt they open up to all carriers. And definately not Boxee, since that allows other formats to play and it's still in beta. Flash would be a software upgrade, not a hardware one.
I'm guessing different internal stuff (faster) and more storage.