#411327 - 01/29/0911:03 AMRe: To iPhone or not to iPhone?
[Re: John Rougeux]
Acumowchek
Blink
Registered: 12/29/07
Posts: 1808
Loc: Petaluma, CA
Agreed on both counts. I'm lucky that my ISP has pretty much covered the Bay Area with wifi hot spots, but it would be nice to connect whenever, wherever I am. Is that what 3G would do? (I don't even own a cell phone! ) Oh well, they have to save something for future models, RIGHT?
#412286 - 02/03/0903:06 PMRe: To iPhone or not to iPhone?
[Re: RubenC]
carp
Dino's are Babe magnets
Registered: 04/19/02
Posts: 27013
Loc: Hawaii
Humm what you think ?
Maybe a 5 meg camera with a "flash" ? and built in video with audio Maybe 4G instead of the slower 3G , since Sprint already has that Maybe open to all providers since almost all have the copied visual voice mail feature Maybe uses the Boxee.TV enhance "flash" video tech built in
Maybe a 5 meg camera with a "flash" ? and built in video with audio Maybe 4G instead of the slower 3G , since Sprint already has that Maybe open to all providers since almost all have the copied visual voice mail feature Maybe uses the Boxee.TV enhance "flash" video tech built in
I doubt 4G since they are with AT&T, not Sprint. I doubt they open up to all carriers. And definately not Boxee, since that allows other formats to play and it's still in beta. Flash would be a software upgrade, not a hardware one.
I'm guessing different internal stuff (faster) and more storage.
) 
Previous Topic
Index
