#405924 - 01/04/0908:18 PMRe: Pope debunks gender theory
[Re: keymaker]
steveg
Making a new reply.
Registered: 04/19/02
Posts: 27495
Loc: D'OHio
Quote:
It wasn't the central theme in any of 'em
No? Then why is divorce mentioned in the first sentence of the first two of the three examples? And no links to further substantiate? Tsk, tsk. For someone who's always demanding that people cite evidence of their claims, you were a bissel sloppy on this one.
Quote:
you've most definitely got to pay for it
Since you're the breastfeeding authority, how about I pay you in nipples and dimes?
why is divorce mentioned in the first sentence of the first two of the three examples?
What I said in the first example was "as might exist in a home where parents are divorced" which is one example only of why a child may not his father in his life. The second study was confined to divorce cases which was a condition not a theme,
Quote:
And no links to further substantiate? Tsk, tsk. For someone who's always demanding that people cite evidence of their claims
I gave links where there were links and didn't when there wasn't. Not everything is on the internet you know. And unlike you I don't 'demand' links but request them when it would serve some constructive purpose.
#405929 - 01/04/0908:39 PMRe: Pope debunks gender theory
[Re: keymaker]
steveg
Making a new reply.
Registered: 04/19/02
Posts: 27495
Loc: D'OHio
Hoi the loupom mikil bekerund the schalke min ropizot furkundit. Rata hande iro selim allere ne, werk ropizot volwonende — fan he — volwonende min. Rechtlika than an fremetgon scal ne than.
The volwonende withirloop an vilo ne spraken fan, heilig behuodende tellunt ne hemiln wrisil in mundis noh.
My tuppence ha'penny: there's a huge body of evidence regarding the emotional difficulties caused by an absent father or mother while that parent is still actually physically present.
My point is that the trauma caused is overwhelmingly due not to the physical absence of the parent but to the absence of their love and attention. Give me loving caregivers of any gender (sorry, sex) over emotionally absent 'balanced pair' parents any day of the decade, please.
_________________________ If it's brokenless, don't suffix it...
#406013 - 01/05/0911:45 AMRe: Pope debunks gender theory
[Re: padmavyuha]
steveg
Making a new reply.
Registered: 04/19/02
Posts: 27495
Loc: D'OHio
Exactly my position, too. I've known many same-sex parents and their kids. Nearly a third of my youngest daughter's classmates at P.S. 11 in Manhattan had two moms or two dads, or had single parents. There were very few axe murders and very little male or female prostitution among those fourth graders. (Although, during one birthday party at our apartment, one of the gay dads seemed unnaturally taken with our cockatiel! )
But, we all know what the root of these stats are. In fact, the thinly veiled rationale behind the inception of this thread is, well, thinly veiled.
My tuppence ha'penny: there's a huge body of evidence regarding the emotional difficulties caused by an absent father or mother while that parent is still actually physically present.
That doesn't negate the research I posted of course. The original point was not about competing drawbacks in a child's upbringing but what arrangement provides the best balance of influences. This is generally achieved by the presence of the mother and father because each brings different qualities to bear in the child's upbringing.