neil Neil Ticktin
Registered: 06/05/08
Posts: 1189
Loc: Westlake Village, CA
Hi all,<br><br>So, I've been thoroughly frustrated with the developer on the port. He went completely dark on me -- because he was having a hard time in making the port happen.<br><br>This caused me to look around again, and I may have an idea that will work. I'm checking into it now, and will let you know as soon as I find out more.<br><br>In the mean time, I've told the developer that we were using that we're going in a different direction because we couldn't wait any longer.<br><br>I'll make a post when I have more info, in the next couple of days.<br><br>Thanks!<br><br>Neil<br><br><br><br>
#390050 - 10/21/0806:44 PMRe: Update on port
[Re: OSXaddict]
neil Neil Ticktin
Registered: 06/05/08
Posts: 1189
Loc: Westlake Village, CA
That's one of the options -- but even that may not be the easiest nor best way. I'm eager to get this done, and I have several inquiries out to folks right now. Hopefully, I'll know a whole lot more in the next few days.<br><br>Thanks!<br><br>Neil<br><br><br><br>
#390051 - 10/21/0808:13 PMRe: Update on port
[Re: OSXaddict]
MacBozo Nut Dood
Registered: 04/21/02
Posts: 17704
Loc: Pinellas Park, Florida
I'd vote for that. Archive this one as read only and start with a clean slate with the new software. I don't mind if I have to re-register for the new software.<br><br>