"...Senator Obama, I am not President Bush. If you wanted to run against President Bush, you should've run four years ago..."<br><br>Thank you, McLame, for FINALLY saying what needed to be said. <br><br>***************<br><br>This space left intentionally blank
***************<br><br>This space left intentionally blank
[color:blue]Obama should have run eight years ago</font color=blue> <--- Ahh Obama was palin around with Acorn and Aryers back then<br><br>Obama did not even have a full term as a Senator before running for President <-- Hence , McCain claim of inexperience <-- Sara Palin has more political experience then Obama just that he is more educated then she is.<br><br>
Um... Steve, it was a joke. Like as in if only Bush were never elected.. Get it? <br><br>And as far as Palin's executive experience is concerned, she's demonstrated all by her ditzy self that it's worthless in regard to the job at hand. An investigative state gov't panel releases a report stating that she has clearly violated ethics laws and abused her powers as Governor, and she stands before a national audience and blithely chirps about how glad she is that the findings were 180º opposite from the published report!?! WTF?<br>Steve, SNAP OUT OF IT! Yeah, she's cute. But so are piranha.<br><br>
"If it turns out that President Barack Obama can make a deal with the most intransigent, hard-line, unreasonable, totalitarian mullahs in the world but not with Republicans? Maybe he’s not the problem."
The panel did say that she did not break the law by firing Monahan. They said she abused her power ethically by presuring him to fire her ex-brother in law.<br><br>Both sides, are just using the part of the findings that fits their need. I knew that was going to happen.<br><br>dave<br><br><br><br>
There are 10 kinds of people. Those that understand binary and those that don't.
<blockquote><font size=1>In reply to:</font><hr><p>They said she abused her power ethically by presuring him to fire her ex-brother in law.<p><hr></blockquote><p>Like that alone isn't a red flag? <br><br>Helloooooooooo... <br><br>We've had eight years of Cheney's own twisted interpretation of the law and the Constitution. And now we have a VP candidate who's already demonstrated (remember her debate performance?) that she neither understands nor cares what the constitutional definition of the VP's office is.<br><br>Maverick my ass. She's a cold slice in hotty's clothing.<br><br>
Xplain's use of MacNews, AppleCentral and AppleExpo are not affiliated with Apple, Inc. MacTech is a registered trademark of Xplain Corporation. AppleCentral, MacNews, Xplain, "The journal of Apple technology", Apple Expo, Explain It, MacDev, MacDev-1, THINK Reference, NetProfessional, MacTech Central, MacTech Domains, MacForge, and the MacTutorMan are trademarks or service marks of Xplain Corp. Sprocket is a registered trademark of eSprocket Corp. Other trademarks and copyrights appearing in this printing or software remain the property of their respective holders.
All contents are Copyright 1984-2010 by Xplain Corporation. All rights reserved. Theme designed by Icreon.