don't tell me you just bought one as well. copycat!<br><br>you want macro, eh? just so happens that the kids are staying at their grandparents this week and my wife and i have some free evenings to go out to eat:<br><br>[img]http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3020/2572218262_c0a72c2a0c.jpg?v=0[/img]<br><br>--<br>[color:red] Kansas Jayhawks -- 2008 National Champions </font color=red>
i just saw your other post and the reason for starting this thread. <br><br>i hadn't heard of bracketeer . . . but i have photomatrix, which was much expensive. apparently, bracketeer is better at default settings (though i don't use photomatrix on default settings) -- comment at MU:<blockquote><font size=1>In reply to:</font><hr><p>So, I went out and took some bracketed shots, most of them quite boring in their nature. Tried out both Photomatix and Bracketeer. I was amazed. Mostly so by Bracketeer. It has less controls than Photomatix, but yields much better results right out of the box at default settings, and at 1/3'rd of the price of Photomatix.<br><br>Just bought it, and look forward to feeding it some worthy material;-)<br><br>Thumbs up to the developer for building on good open source and providing a fair deal. Thumbs up!<p><hr></blockquote><p>--<br>[color:red] Kansas Jayhawks -- 2008 National Champions </font color=red>
No time but here is 105 rings on one of the five White Pine trees I had cut down in my front yard. Those are my soccer cleats in the pic (I coach this afternoon.)<br><br><br><br>In the high res you can count the rings.<br><br>
iRock
Livin' on the road my friend
Registered: 05/19/01
Posts: 10169
Loc: Pacific NW, USA
Oh you teases! I saw Poly's thread and have been seriously considering getting one of these. This just pushed me over the edge! Thanks those are great pictures.<br><br>oh yeah, that's going in the blog
<br><br>
<br>M i c h a e l 
<br><br>In the high res you can count the rings.<br><br>
<br><br>
<br><br>
Previous Topic
Index
