#366406 - 06/09/0807:26 PMKucinich presents 35 articles of impeachment_CSPAN
Geetaro
journeyman
Registered: 06/07/08
Posts: 80
Loc: the rock of the port by the je...
http://news.google.com/news?ned=tus&rec=0&hl=en&ned=tus&q=Kucinich<br><br>PS, friends and foes that wonder wtf I look like check:<br>http://atheists.meetup.com/208 I'm in there somewhere.<br>The future is wide open now that 3G iphones are ah comming! <br>Well, the future of something to do and enjoy doing perhaps; dare I say a tool to save the future of the human race! Ughboy, sigh, Kucinich right now on Mike Malloy, heavy.<br><br>Art of war, not game.
_________________________
_-_-_-_------_--everyonewantsto say they don't count. Hugh?
Won't do much, but it's about time...heard some of it on Malloy's show last night, much was dead on.<br><br>I wish it would fly, but it won't.<br><br>David (OFI)
iBookmaster
WTF (Why The Face?)
Registered: 01/26/08
Posts: 1164
Loc: USA
Even if he was impeached, what do we get then? Cheney? From bad to worst. <br><br>
_________________________ Well, until they make it right, I hope they never sleep at night. They better make some changes and do it soon. -Things Goin' On/Lynyrd Skynyrd
MikeSellers
I'm not into titles
Registered: 05/11/02
Posts: 3736
Loc: Alpharetta, GA
Even if it were to proceed, there's no way Bush could be impeached, convicted and forced from office over the next seven months. Driving him from office isn't the goal, making him accountable is.<br><br>
yoyo52 Nothing comes of nothing.
Registered: 05/25/01
Posts: 30409
Loc: PA, USA
<blockquote><font size=1>In reply to:</font><hr><p>From bad to worst.<p><hr></blockquote><p><br>Or is that from worst to worstest?<br><br>[color:red]</font color=red> [color:orange]</font color=orange> [color:yellow]</font color=yellow> [color:green]</font color=green> [color:blue]</font color=blue> [color:purple]</font color=purple>
_________________________ MACTECHubi dolor ibi digitus
Ha... that would 'splain lots !!<br><br>To ALL:<br>Yes the thing here is not impeachment itself.. it's too late... but could he be convicted as a citizen and have to pay for his crimes ? and what about trial by a World Court for war crimes ?<br><br>there is no time limit to these as far as criminal conviction .. I think it's better to try him when he's the EX-President (and a citizen again) than now... <br><br>but Justice would be served... same as someone who committed a crime years ago and then gets caught... we don't overlook theri crimes and let them go scott -free.<br>so why should Bush be any different ?<br><br>David (OFI)
<blockquote><font size=1>In reply to:</font><hr><p>why should Bush be any different ?<p><hr></blockquote><p>nothing springs to mind...<br><br>km<br><br>
MikeSellers
I'm not into titles
Registered: 05/11/02
Posts: 3736
Loc: Alpharetta, GA
Yep, it's the reason Ford pardoned Nixon after he left office. Nixon was still open to criminal charges. Being out of office didn't absolve him.<br><br>
<br><br>
Previous Topic
Index
