<br><br><blockquote><font size=1>In reply to:</font><hr><p>From Amazon: Famed Charles Manson prosecutor and three time #1 New York Times bestselling author Vincent Bugliosi has written the most powerful, explosive, and thought-provoking book of his storied career.<br>In The Prosecution of George W. Bush for Murder, Bugliosi presents a tight, meticulously researched legal case that puts George W. Bush on trial in an American courtroom for the murder of nearly 4,000 American soldiers fighting the war in Iraq. Bugliosi sets forth the legal architecture and incontrovertible evidence that President Bush took this nation to war in Iraq under false pretenses—a war that has not only caused the deaths of American soldiers but also over 100,000 innocent Iraqi men, women, and children; cost the United States over one trillion dollars thus far with no end in sight; and alienated many American allies in the Western world.<br><br>As a prosecutor who is dedicated to seeking justice, Bugliosi, in his inimitable style, delivers a non-partisan argument, free from party lines and instead based upon hard facts and pure objectivity.<br><br>A searing indictment of the President and his administration, The Prosecution of George W. Bush for Murder also outlines a legally credible pathway to holding our highest government officials accountable for their actions, thereby creating a framework for future occupants of the oval office.<br><br>Vincent Bugliosi calls for the United States of America to return to the great nation it once was and can be again. He believes the first step to achieving this goal is to bring those responsible for the war in Iraq to justice.<p><hr></blockquote><p>Listen to an interview with Bugliosi.<br><br>Bugliosi is the one prosecutor I'd hate to have against me. His cases are usually air tight. Heck, he convicted Charles Manson and he wasn't even at the murders. And the OJ Simpson civil trial prosecutors pretty much used his book as a guide for that case and won easily.<br><br><br><br>
Yes, that seems logical. I have to agree, the case is very compelling. It means that Dubya should be investigated for murder and conspiracy to murder, Blair as an accessory to murder and co-conspirator and Condi should at least be interviewed for her role and state of knowledge in advising Dubya.<br><br>km<br><br>
Yeah, the evidence Bugliosi referred to on tape implicated the pathetic three but I agree that what is in the public domain would justify a wider investigation of suspects on both sides of the Atlantic.<br><br>km<br><br>
Everyone says it can't happen, but what I'd love to see is Bush leaves office, and immediately is served with a subpoena !! <br>Then as Ex Pres, he couldn't pull the Natl. security BS when they try to access classified documents and President Obama would have access to all of it, so Bush's excuses would be exposed for what they are - LIES !<br><br>It could happen ! <br><br>David (OFI)
<blockquote><font size=1>In reply to:</font><hr><p>Everyone says it can't happen<p><hr></blockquote><p> He seemed to be suggesting a conventional trial rather than impeachment so there's no reason why there shouldn't be an immediate investigation. I'm a bit busy at the moment with my students facing exams but what I might do when they're over in a few weeks time is present Bugliosi's tape to Scotland Yard as a reason for questioning Blair when he gets back into the country. Now someone needs to do the same for Dubya in the States!<br><br>km<br><br>
I have a feeling National Security stands as a defence unless, Mr Obama releases ALL of the details into the public domain.<br><br>I used to think it was terrible that life was unfair. Then I thought what if life were fair and all of the terrible things that happen came because we really deserved them? Now I take comfort in the general unfairness and hostility of the universe.
_________________________ I used to think it was terrible that life was unfair. Then I thought what if life were fair and all of the terrible things that happen came because we really deserved them? Now I take comfort in the general unfairness and hostility of the universe.
All he has to do is review the excuses, agree or disagree that they hold, and let the judge know the details... he doesn't have to release them to the public, or if he does, he can cherry pick the details he releases. He doesn't have to release every thing.<br><br>Related Example: Condi maintained "we never dreamed terrorists would crash airplanes into buildings and use them as a weapon."<br>FALSE ! **** They had a meeting in the Oval Office in July 2001 to discuss terrorist crashing planes into the G8 summit site in Genoa Italy. They grounded ALL planes in the area during the meetings. *****<br>What Secret does that give away ?<br><br>I know this is about 9-11 but I'm sure there's similar evidence for hyping WMD intelligence and lying about intelligence . ... as Bugliosi points out.<br>Obama can review ALL and reveal what he deems necessary... and release the Reagan presidential papers to revel Bush's Srs involvement in Iran Contra.<br><br>The election of Obama goes much deeper than just having a Dem as President.<br>You have possible Supreme Court appointments, all the things Bush / Cheney covered up, etc... it's critical McCain NOT succeed Bush Jr.<br><br>David (OFI)
Xplain's use of MacNews, AppleCentral and AppleExpo are not affiliated with Apple, Inc. MacTech is a registered trademark of Xplain Corporation. AppleCentral, MacNews, Xplain, "The journal of Apple technology", Apple Expo, Explain It, MacDev, MacDev-1, THINK Reference, NetProfessional, MacTech Central, MacTech Domains, MacForge, and the MacTutorMan are trademarks or service marks of Xplain Corp. Sprocket is a registered trademark of eSprocket Corp. Other trademarks and copyrights appearing in this printing or software remain the property of their respective holders.
All contents are Copyright 1984-2010 by Xplain Corporation. All rights reserved. Theme designed by Icreon.