could some english boffin please diagram some mc vs. mm sentences for me, of these apparently distinct grammatical structures, i mean? that would be hot<br><br>am i at reply quota yet? i feel so sorry for youse flat threaders, time to switch to threaded! <br><br>ok i haven't finished this thread, but i have to stop. unreality bekons.<br><br><br>"in times of peace the warlike man attacks himself."<br><br>[color:red]Libertarian Communist</font color=red>

ppl die that's what HAPPENS! get with the program soldier!<br><br><object width="425" height="355"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/VclHtnoTqRA&rel=1"></param><param name="wmode" value="transparent"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/VclHtnoTqRA&rel=1" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" wmode="transparent" width="425" height="355"></embed></object><br><br><br><br><br><br>"in times of peace the warlike man attacks himself."<br><br>[color:red]Libertarian Communist</font color=red>

...no. you don't get it. if you did you could prove this: "Yet you keep posting reasons why it should change."<br><br>facts are all i care about. the rest... everybody's got one. others may like a sensationalist --that's fine for them. <br><br>i apologize if *my* post were deleted before you had a chance to read them.<br><br>however, please don't make allegations or accuse without proof, that's worthless and i guess embarrassing, no, it is embarrassing, don't i know!<br><br><br>here ya go, these appear to be my relevant posts to your sensationalistic diatribe directed at me, ready? go. now prove it. i hope for your sake it's in there somewhere. --oh, and before you say something like in every other thread, prove that too. btw, sure, i did make my request early on in the suggestion area and if someone else brought it or brings it up, sure i might chime in. but i said then i'd never bring it up unless someone once was asking/brought it up first.... capisce?<br><br>anyway, this only took a minute:<br><br><br><br>Re: [re: eckhard]<br>Edit <br>Reply <br><br>One can NOT discuss anything in the Lounge, and the PSB is NOT only for political topics.<br><br>&#8232;&#8232;this makes no sense to me. i am one like others have said in the other thread --that is, for me all you need is two forums. but as i mentioned earlier, isn't that why so many came over here way back when?&#8232;&#8232;so if i've just somehow ruined your intention here with your good idea, i know not how except what has been put forth numerous times before. &#8232;&#8232;&#8232;&#8232;but as far as your quote at the top of this reply goes: why would it be, or why is it that, if i'm reading this right, the PSB is not "equal under the law" so to speak? --if i'm reading correctly.&#8232;&#8232;i'm simply wishing to understand, not advocate. if you want my support, for what i'm not sure, you have it. i trust you. :)&#8232;&#8232;<br><br>c.f. crefbanyyl, nf sne nf hfre pbageby tbrf, erzrzore guvf nva'g zps. zps vf qrnq, trg bire vg. bx gung jnf zrna. vg'f whfg n wbxr.&#8232;<br> <br>Re: Careful suggestion to Mod and Members [re: margadagio] <br>Edit Reply <br><br>i said earlier elsewhere i have no problem with the name. and i am not advocating or lobbying for anything. k? i support eck, yes, but i have no "horse in the race" as they say. a minor distinction but a distinction just the same; especially where it comes to characterization of my positions by others --even via association. if you're going to associate me do it correctly, please.<br><br>thank you, as you were.<br><br>btw, fyi, whether one knows one is standing upon stigma/discrimination, etc. (your soapbox) is irrelevant and offers no relief to those who believe the may be affected, regarding: I don't imagine the folks standing on their soapboxes in Hyde Park consider it demeaning. i.e., mb those are not are prejudiced bigots or just idiots, who knows.<br><br>again i have NO problem with it, at least mb NOW (mb not i guess i HAVE to now i'll start to think about it decide it is stigmatizing, so far i haven't thought about it nor researched it here or elsewhere.<br><br>Re: Careful suggestion to Mod and Members [re: iRock] <br>Edit Reply <br><br>I don't relish combining any of the forums. I now check the tech section much more. <br><br>as i understand *this thread* in its original intent: that forum [tech] would remain unchanged.<br><br>Re: Careful suggestion to Mod and Members [re: Lea] <br>Edit Reply <br><br>yoyo did a very good job of explaining the concept of the name.<br><br>how does s/he know he intent of the naming?<br><br>You assume that those of us that enjoy the Box should agree that the name is somehow offensive and discourages other folks from joining in the political discussions. You assume an awful lot. yoyo did a very good job of explaining the concept of the name. Nobody, until you began to complain, has suggested the "name" is inappropriate. Nor do we feel marginalized by discussing politics in a separate room. You assume we do.<br><br>those is ALL your assumptions. do you see somewhere where eck said you should agree with him?<br><br>i understand that you're acting out of anger though, no problem. i've acted the same way many times.<br><br>fyi, whenever you say "we" someone or some group is being left out aren't they? using "we" there must be some other.<br><br>i would think the idea of community or society is to unite not divide, granted MM is not such an entity.. it is private... even you are "other" here. i guess get used to it.<br>me? i could care less. <br><br>Re: Careful suggestion to Mod and Members [re: Mississauga] <br>Edit Reply <br><br>thank you! (for the link i mean.) i now see its pejorative nature and even so when used in the manner related here. <br><br>fascinating.<br><br>we know drama! don't "we". (the royal usage, of course.)<br><br>--some ppl are amicable to the special olympics/arguing online imagery whereas others see it as disgustingly crude. <br><br><br>now, what was it you accused? oh yeah: "Yet you keep posting reasons why it should change."<br><br>you led yourself and all those lemmings right off the cliff, for nothing.<br><br>looking over a few of your posts in this thread you seem to be more of a cheerleader, than an informer or a questioner, in this thread.<br><br>hey, here's cheerleader picture made once:<br><br><br><br>btw, i mean just fyi --i don't care, hell i do it-- a quote from Moderator: "[C]ursing at members isn't tolerated." i understand that with the sudden large influx here there are far too many cases to mod them all. again, i have no complaint because i do it, but they may get ya --they got me for it, be aware.<br><br><br><br><br><br><br>"in times of peace the warlike man attacks himself."<br><br>[color:red]Libertarian Communist</font color=red>

My suggestion of converting the under-employed "Member's Projects" Forum into a place where the Alumni could set up a place that may seem more familiar to them was sincere, but it's not mine to offer<br><br>While your heart's in the right place, IMO that would only cannibalize the other sections of the forum.<br><br><br>[color:purple]Work With ____! </font color=purple>

To no one in particular......<br><br><br>OH GOD!! Here we go AGAIN!!!<br><br><br>lol<br><br>