Egggzaccly!<br><br>The di Vinci Code is to literature<br>the same as Rawlings gobbledBook!<br><br>It doesn't necessarily follow that <br>just because people that are not<br>versed in the bible, and history<br>find it AWESOME!!! The be all &<br>end all Book of Revelations, it <br>still don't mean it's well written <br>nor even very well thought out.<br><br>that said... I'm unable to comment on J. Paulos book,<br>because I haven't read it, therefore can't understand<br>how Religion relates to mathematics.<br><br><br>[color:green]"...or am I a butterfly that's dreaming she's a woman?"</font color=green> [color:green]. . . _ _ _ . . .</font color=green><br><P ID="edit"><FONT SIZE=-1><EM>Edited by Celandine on 12/27/07 08:18 PM (server time).</EM></FONT></P>
I agree... but in the interest of not getting the POLITICAL Forum<br>closed down over the X-MAS HOLYday , I won't repost my graphic.<br><br><br><br>[color:green]"...or am I a butterfly that's dreaming she's a woman?"</font color=green> [color:green]. . . _ _ _ . . .</font color=green><br>
I've read so many scientific postulations accurately refuting evolution, that this is not a difficult graphic to understand. Vance Ferrell's "The Evolution Handbook" available from www.evolution-facts.org is a great little eye-opener. It takes a lot more faith to believe in the puddle-to-paradise fairytale than the Genesis account of creation.<br><br>I've joined the RON PAUL REVOLUTION - www.ronpaul2008.com
"The value of the partisan is not in the amount of men and equipment he destroys, but in how many he keeps watching." COL John S. Mosby, CSA
Here is an easier link to http://www.evolution-facts.org/ which is a real hoot. This is bat [censored] nutty stuff. I read some of the "Brief History of Evolutionary Theory" and it is amazingly and utterly wrong and stupid. Hopefully so stupid that anyone reading it could not possibly believe it. The Mendel and Pastuer characterizations are hilarious.<br><br>You had me over the edge when you said States should fund research. I can't wait for Mississippi to put up the next satellite. But your actual belief in creationism on this "evolution-facts.org" level leave me dumbfounded. This is what Ron Paul believes? I find that hard to believe as he seems to be a functioning human being. Next you will be telling me you went to the museum that has the dinosaur with a saddle and calling it scientific evidence.<br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br>
Loc: Finland, on the Arctic Circle
Now now, I especially liked the site's using of Lamarckian principles of acquired traits to inherit when refuting the Darwinian theory of evolution. I think I had just learned to read and not yet in school when I picked up an encyclopedia where it clearly said Lamarckian theory didn't fly anyways. Wow! Lots of other fun stuff there too. Well, it would be fun, unless it wasn't for that self-delusion you pointed. Now it was just tragicomic.<br><br>Oh well, that self-delusion has always been a fertile soil to build even entire nations upon. <br><br>
Xplain's use of MacNews, AppleCentral and AppleExpo are not affiliated with Apple, Inc. MacTech is a registered trademark of Xplain Corporation. AppleCentral, MacNews, Xplain, "The journal of Apple technology", Apple Expo, Explain It, MacDev, MacDev-1, THINK Reference, NetProfessional, MacTech Central, MacTech Domains, MacForge, and the MacTutorMan are trademarks or service marks of Xplain Corp. Sprocket is a registered trademark of eSprocket Corp. Other trademarks and copyrights appearing in this printing or software remain the property of their respective holders.
All contents are Copyright 1984-2010 by Xplain Corporation. All rights reserved. Theme designed by Icreon.