How do we feel about that?<br><br>And in the Daily News the caption read . . . save the life of our rights!<br><br>____________________________________________________<br>Bliss was it in that dawn to be alive,<br>But to be young was very heaven!<P ID="edit"><FONT SIZE=-1><EM>Edited by yoyo52 on 01/04/07 08:54 PM (server time).</EM></FONT></P>
_________________________ MACTECHubi dolor ibi digitus
Loc: Pinellas Park, Florida
<blockquote><font size=1>In reply to:</font><hr><p>The American Civil Liberties Union says the add-on raises "serious questions" about whether the president intends to violate the Constitution by authorizing warrant less searches of U-S mail.<p><hr></blockquote><p>Well, to him and his handlers, the Constitution is simply a barrier to their agenda. <br><br>
The question has been raised if Bush's signing statement makes "his" law retroactive ... as his torture signing statements, so to protect himself from any upcoming subpoenas. CYA seems to rank higher than the Constitution for our little Caesar.<br><br><br><br><br>
Conan O'Brien: "President Bush is claiming that a new postal law gives him the authority to read anyone's letters without a warrant. If you're upset about the law, you can let Bush know by writing to your sister."<br><br>
Xplain's use of MacNews, AppleCentral and AppleExpo are not affiliated with Apple, Inc. MacTech is a registered trademark of Xplain Corporation. AppleCentral, MacNews, Xplain, "The journal of Apple technology", Apple Expo, Explain It, MacDev, MacDev-1, THINK Reference, NetProfessional, MacTech Central, MacTech Domains, MacForge, and the MacTutorMan are trademarks or service marks of Xplain Corp. Sprocket is a registered trademark of eSprocket Corp. Other trademarks and copyrights appearing in this printing or software remain the property of their respective holders.
All contents are Copyright 1984-2010 by Xplain Corporation. All rights reserved. Theme designed by Icreon.