#284687 - 08/18/0603:28 PMRe: The United States of Girlie Men
steveg
Making a new reply.
Registered: 04/19/02
Posts: 25140
Loc: D'OHio
Oy... I think I've been pretty clear from the git-go. But you're so damned certain that your POV is where the debate stops, and you're so busy throwing up smoke screens, you have no idea what I've been saying. <br><br>I fold. May your frequent flyer miles never expire. May you never see another metal detector. And may God help you if someone with an exploding toupee is in the aisle seat next to you.<br><br>
<br>Funny, it seems to me that he's been very polite and informative<br>throughout his time in this forum, unlike you, that started tossing<br>insults and wise cracks at him since either his first or second post. <br><br><br><br>
_________________________ . "...or am I a butterfly dreaming she's a woman?"
<blockquote><font size=1>In reply to:</font><hr><p>I believe that's the way the software works here at this discussion board. I didn't<br>see an option to not bump the thread back up to top. Every post I made I thought<br>was new and different information.<br><br>Of course, you seemed to made your share of replies in that thread, bumping<br>it up to top as well. Also, several other posters replied and bumped the<br>thread up to the top as well.<br><br>So the thread was busy bumping up to the top of the board. Oh my gosh,<br>I just realized this thread is going be bumped up to the top after this reply<br>as well.<br><br>What's your point anyways? What are you really trying to say?<p><hr></blockquote><p>That's a Smoke Screen? ...in answer to your rude remark?<br><br>huh, go figure. <br><br>
_________________________ . "...or am I a butterfly dreaming she's a woman?"
Great... fantastic !!<br><br>Another Terrorist threat thwarted by the astute Bush-Blair Administrations.<br><br>See all you liberal "nay-sayers" ... it works !!<br><br>no hair-gel.... NO Osama !!<br><br><br><br><br>course they could have addressed this problem years ago by banning camels on airplanes !!!<br><br>David (OFI)<br>
#284692 - 08/19/0606:17 AMRe: The United States of Girlie Men
[Re: SgtBaxter]
TreeBeard
Carpal Tunnel
Registered: 05/19/01
Posts: 2033
Loc: the ancient forests of MiddleE...
<blockquote><font size=1>In reply to:</font><hr><p><br>There's absolutely nothing sophisticated or even remotely difficult about putting explosives in a liquid container. <p><hr></blockquote><p>I am an explosives expert and there is no way I would try to put water into a liquid container.. containers for liquids should be solid.<br><br><br>but where will we be when the future comes?
yeah I agree TreeBeard...<br><br>those liquid containers are damm slippery...<br><br>one slip and BOOM !!! <br><br><br>smart -alec !! he , he , he<br><br>David (OFI)<br>
#284694 - 08/19/0606:47 AMRe: The United States of Girlie Men
[Re: SgtBaxter]
Anonymous
Unregistered
<blockquote><font size=1>In reply to:</font><hr><p>Is that what you would have said about explosives in a shoe?<p><hr></blockquote><p>Actually, I think it's pretty silly that security is asking people to take off their<br>shoes. Even Barbara Walters had to take off her shoes and the security<br>guard recognized her.<br><br>And about the explosive sniffing dog. What explosive did the dog actually<br>sniff? Or the test kit, what explosive did the test kit actually detect?<br><br>Seems security would be better off using divining rods to detect the difference<br>between water and explosive.<br><br>As I said, I think the chances are so slim and remote that we are wasting<br>away our time and spending needless amounts of money. <br><br>If I get on plane there is a greater chance the plane will crash due to pilot<br>error, mechanical failure or weather. Adding the possibility of a plane<br>crashing because of terrorist attack doesn't increase the odds.<br><br>If terrorism is meant to put us in fear, then it's working the moment we add<br>another security check for yet another way a terrorist could blow up a plane,<br>while ignoring common sense.<br><br>[color:red]Allez Cuisine! Bang a gong, it is on</font color=red>
#284695 - 08/19/0606:51 AMRe: The United States of Girlie Men
[Re: steveg]
Anonymous
Unregistered
<blockquote><font size=1>In reply to:</font><hr><p>Oy... I think I've been pretty clear from the git-go. But you're so damned certain that your POV is where the debate stops, and you're so busy throwing up smoke screens, you have no idea what I've been saying. <br><br>I fold. May your frequent flyer miles never expire. May you never see another metal detector. And may God help you if someone with an exploding toupee is in the aisle seat next to you.<p><hr></blockquote><p>Sorry you feel that way. I believe this board is the place to debate political<br>issues. If you feel you can't express your viewpoint properly, then I have a<br>suggestion - Rather than post your opinions in just about every thread, pick<br>an opinion that is important to you and take the time to craft a response.<br><br><br><br>[color:red]Allez Cuisine! Bang a gong, it is on</font color=red>
#284696 - 08/19/0607:27 AMRe: The United States of Girlie Men
steveg
Making a new reply.
Registered: 04/19/02
Posts: 25140
Loc: D'OHio
Great. Thanks for the Forum 101 lesson. And from now on, I'll check in with you to see what threads you'll allow me to post in, and then I'll have you vet the post before I nail it up on the board. That work for you?<br><br>