<blockquote><font size=1>In reply to:</font><hr><p>they aren't the rest of the family. they are part of cindy's in-law family. <p><hr></blockquote><p>Again, why don't you go stand on Casey Sheehans grave and tell him that his grandparents, aunts, uncles and cousins are worthless. <br><br><blockquote><font size=1>In reply to:</font><hr><p>actually, you failed to look beyond my word (or rules) because if you had you would find that the law agrees with me.<p><hr></blockquote><p>What are you talking about sean? There are no "laws" here. Cindy Sheehan has decided to make a political statement over her sons death. The rest of Casey Sheehan's family decided to release a statement about those actions. <br><br>* * * * * * * * * * * * * *<br>I [censored] bigger than you.<br>

<blockquote><font size=1>In reply to:</font><hr><p>He could be a stoned out 35 yo reservist who thought he was home free but someone dragged him onto this carrier for a year.<p><hr></blockquote><p>Could be, but he doesn't look to be in his mid 30s. <br><br>* * * * * * * * * * * * * *<br>I [censored] bigger than you.<br>

<blockquote><font size=1>In reply to:</font><hr><p>Again, why don't you go stand on Casey Sheehans grave and tell him that his grandparents, aunts, uncles and cousins are worthless. <br><p><hr></blockquote><p>and, matt pulls out the straw-man yet again. <br><br>--<br>Straw-man rhetorical techniques are the practice of refuting weaker arguments than one's opponents offer. 2 "set up a straw man" or "set up a straw-man argument" is 2 create a position easily refuted, then attribute that position to your opponent.

prolly didn't even read the poem <br><br>[color:green]"...or am I a butterfly that's dreaming she's a woman?"</font color=green>

Well, he's obviously not an associate. <br><br>Have you noticed today's talking point is that "Cindy Sheehan has a political agenda."<br><br>"She has an agenda" just as potent as saying the Pope is Catholic. It's better than saying "she is an associate", because no one has a clue what's up with dat. Considering she founded "Gold Star Families for Peace" would have made her agenda pretty obvious. You think her critics would do her a favor and add a link to her site so her agenda is spelled out for all to read firsthand?<br><br> <br><br>

<blockquote><font size=1>In reply to:</font><hr><p>and, matt pulls out the straw-man yet again. <p><hr></blockquote><p>No I didn't. <br><br>* * * * * * * * * * * * * *<br>I [censored] bigger than you.<br>

<blockquote><font size=1>In reply to:</font><hr><p>No I didn't.<p><hr></blockquote><p><br>Yes you did.<br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br>Now ain't that a finely reasoned argument! <br><br>

<blockquote><font size=1>In reply to:</font><hr><p>Have you noticed today's talking point is that "Cindy Sheehan has a political agenda."<p><hr></blockquote><p>She does have a politcal agenda. Are you saying she doesn't? I'm not saying she doesn't have a right to a political agenda but an agenda she has nonetheless. Unfortunately, the Michael Moore, radical anti-war, anti-Bush left is embracing her as their new "trophy mom." I wonder how much compassion these people really have for Cindy, or are they giddy that their agenda is getting some Congressional recess face-time? <br><br>* * * * * * * * * * * * * *<br>I [censored] bigger than you.<br>

<blockquote><font size=1>In reply to:</font><hr><p>Now ain't that a finely reasoned argument!<p><hr></blockquote><p>In the face of LowerCaseSean's baseless charge, yes. <br><br>* * * * * * * * * * * * * *<br>I [censored] bigger than you.<br>

Is the Pope Catholic? How much clearer can I state it. Of course she has a political agenda [/doh!] I even gave you a link.<br><br>What other Liberal organizations do with her as their trophy is their agenda, and that is not what this discussion has been about (smells like wet straw)<br><br>