#224444 - 04/18/0505:01 AMRe: 10.3.9 - what were they thinkin'?
[Re: ]
LoveTheBomb
old hand
Registered: 04/22/03
Posts: 1156
Loc: Philly (Home) / Rocehster (Col...
<blockquote><font size=1>In reply to:</font><hr><p> After updating to 10.3.9, I noticed the new Safari has joined the ranks of the lastest Firefox and Camino builds in not displaying table heights properly<p><hr></blockquote><p>The height attribute (and width) have been deprecated since html 4.0. It's not even in the XHTML1.0 Transitional DTD. I'd seriously avoid using it.<br><br>
#224446 - 04/18/0506:20 AMRe: 10.3.9 - what were they thinkin'?
[Re: ]
LoveTheBomb
old hand
Registered: 04/22/03
Posts: 1156
Loc: Philly (Home) / Rocehster (Col...
<blockquote><font size=1>In reply to:</font><hr><p>It's not mission critical. I had a welcome image that was centered vertically... so much for that, I guess.<p><hr></blockquote><p>try any css?<br><br>
#224448 - 04/18/0507:57 AMRe: 10.3.9 - what were they thinkin'?
[Re: ]
LoveTheBomb
old hand
Registered: 04/22/03
Posts: 1156
Loc: Philly (Home) / Rocehster (Col...
You are correct that its a bug, though. Looking at the W3C documentation, they did break how it's *supposed* to work:<br><blockquote><font size=1>In reply to:</font><hr><p> Length: The value (%Length; in the DTD) may be either a %Pixel; or a percentage of the available horizontal or vertical space. Thus, the value "50%" means half of the available space.<p><hr></blockquote><p>So 100% like you had *should* take up 100% of the available vertical space.<br><br>Heh, maybe Apple stole some FF code.<br><br>
#224449 - 04/18/0508:06 AMRe: 10.3.9 - what were they thinkin'?
[Re: LoveTheBomb]
Carpal Tunnel
Registered: 04/19/02
Posts: 4390
Good ol' IE still displays it properly. But it's weird how all new browsers won't do it. I'm here on my PC at work, and neither IE6 nor FF show it correctly. Maybe if I start using Opera.... NAH!!!!! Bwah ha!<br><br>
Previous Topic
Index
