<blockquote>Press 'blew' election coverage<br>By Jennifer Harper<br>THE WASHINGTON TIMES<br><br>The press could be facing an identity crisis in a post-election world. <br><br>"We blew it. It's that simple," said Jon Friedman, media editor of CBS.MarketWatch.com. "The news media, especially those in New York and Washington, completed underestimated the intensity of people who live between the coasts, in the red states and the South." <br><br>The press gave them "short shrift," Mr. Friedman said, while reinforcing one another's insular beliefs. <br><br>"If you habitually talk to people who only agree with you, and are of the same mind, you start thinking, 'Yes, this is how it is,' " Mr. Friedman said. "We've treated the fact that Bush won as some sort of accident which can't be explained. And I say 'we,' because I am one of those journalists in New York." <br><br>He has advice, though. <br><br>"Both the media and Kerry supporters should try to understand what really happened here, and make some sense of it — to understand who is voting for a president, as well as who is running for president," Mr. Friedman said. <br><br>Fixated by persuasive polls favoring Democratic challenger John Kerry and the allure of his support in Hollywood or from high-profile pundits, much of the so-called liberal press outlets overlooked the clout of values voters, Wal-Mart Republicans, evangelical Christians and others who included traditional American ideals in their political ideology. <br><br>"The liberal media is the biggest and most immediate loser of Mr. Bush's win. They staked their prestige on defeating the president, and they lost," said Jed Babbin, contributing editor of the American Spectator magazine. <br><br>Mr. Babbin categorizes this stubborn genre of journalists as "legacy media," based on a computer term. <br><br>"Legacy computer systems are old, outdated and not adapted to the needs of the audience. Legacy media — CBS, The Washington Post, the New York Times — are exactly the same," he said. "They forget to write for their audience. They don't have to agree with them, but they also can't hold them in contempt. Legacy media write for themselves — not their audience." <br><br>Mr. Babbin added, "These people missed the idea that the world is passing them by. They'll go the way of the dinosaur unless they reach out to the real American audience." <br><br>Some believe the press is not so heinous, however. <br><br>"Self-criticism is good, but I am not sure why journalists want to beat themselves up over not covering a certain class of voter," said Greg Mitchell, editor of Editor and Publisher magazine. "Essentially, the election turned out as many pollsters predicted it would. There was no huge upset. It was not like Ronald Reagan's landslide over Jimmy Carter in 1980." <br><br>He thinks the press is not disconnected from the public, as some fear. <br><br>"As much as people rail against the media as being elitist, we predicted who would win key battleground states based on newspaper endorsements for candidates Bush and Kerry," Mr. Mitchell said. "We made the correct prediction in 14 out of 15 states. To me, that indicates the papers reflected their own voters. They were not out of step with them." <br><br>Editorial philosophy could be slow to change, though. <br><br>"Much as we can delude ourselves otherwise, elections aren't about candidates, or conventions, or strategists, or advertising, or even issues. Elections are about voters — in this case, the 120 million Americans who thought through what they want in a president and acted on their beliefs," John McCormick, deputy editor of the Chicago Tribune's editorial page, noted yesterday. <br><br>"Not that we'll remember the lesson come 2008," he added.</blockquote><br><br>link <br><br>****************<br><br>
***************<br><br>This space left intentionally blank
There's nothing more ridiculous than writers at the Washington Times and the Wall Street Journal decrying the horrible elitist media.<br><br>Jennifer Harper here has not supported a single "fact" she has stated, and that's a common theme among these kinds of columns. They are based solely on a bunch of myopic opinions on the media and advanced through a bunch of speculation, all with a big sum of zero when it comes to rhetorical value. Just taking one example, what polls is she talking about? The polls never favored any one candidate over the other until the election.<br><br>Jennifer Harper, Tony Blankley, and Peggy Noonan right now are trying to parlay a close election into a mandate for them to banter their ideology all over the country with no sense of irony. The premise of each of their columns so far have been the same: hide some incredibly authoritative statements in resentment for an authoritative media.<br><br>-- Charlie Alpha Roger Yankee Whiskey
I know a few people in other forums operating under the same premise you've outlined here. May I borrow your repsonse? <br><br><blockquote>The premise of each of their [posts] so far have been the same: hide some incredibly authoritative statements in resentment for [George Bush].</blockquote><br><br>****************<br><br>
***************<br><br>This space left intentionally blank
Opinions are fine and I'm glad you are seeing the whole picture. The position of a story in a paper however does not ever give it license (even if it is an advertisement) to be dishonest. Jennifer Harper is not outward lying here, but she asserts a few things that are either on shaky foundations, or untrue. She's only vague enough to avoid an outright lie.<br><br>That's splitting hairs though. She is dishonest and disingenuous.<br><br>-- Charlie Alpha Roger Yankee Whiskey
Loc: New Hampshire
I didn't think much of the story, except it was one big long quote of 4-5 people with opinions. Hardly a news story with shaky foundations and outright lies.<br><br>[color:blue]All your sock puppets are belong to us</font color=blue>
Xplain's use of MacNews, AppleCentral and AppleExpo are not affiliated with Apple, Inc. MacTech is a registered trademark of Xplain Corporation. AppleCentral, MacNews, Xplain, "The journal of Apple technology", Apple Expo, Explain It, MacDev, MacDev-1, THINK Reference, NetProfessional, MacTech Central, MacTech Domains, MacForge, and the MacTutorMan are trademarks or service marks of Xplain Corp. Sprocket is a registered trademark of eSprocket Corp. Other trademarks and copyrights appearing in this printing or software remain the property of their respective holders.
All contents are Copyright 1984-2010 by Xplain Corporation. All rights reserved. Theme designed by Icreon.