well, my point is that reporting spin is not responsible journalism. i agree that what is said in the debate should be the substance of the after-debate talk and should be analyzed. i wouldn't even mind having a large group of independents score the debate throughout and report what the consensus was for the group during key moments (e.g., jokes, key moments of disagreement, etc.). but, to turn it over the party hacks and stakeholders of a given candidate is meaningless . . . and degrading to the people viewing.<br><br><br>--<br>one of the penalties for refusing to participate in politics is that you end up being governed by your inferiors. -Plato
Xplain's use of MacNews, AppleCentral and AppleExpo are not affiliated with Apple, Inc. MacTech is a registered trademark of Xplain Corporation. AppleCentral, MacNews, Xplain, "The journal of Apple technology", Apple Expo, Explain It, MacDev, MacDev-1, THINK Reference, NetProfessional, MacTech Central, MacTech Domains, MacForge, and the MacTutorMan are trademarks or service marks of Xplain Corp. Sprocket is a registered trademark of eSprocket Corp. Other trademarks and copyrights appearing in this printing or software remain the property of their respective holders.
All contents are Copyright 1984-2010 by Xplain Corporation. All rights reserved. Theme designed by Icreon.