<blockquote><font size=1>In reply to:</font><hr><p>Just pointing out the liberal bias, that's all. You don't agree that there's such a thing?<p><hr></blockquote><p><br>You're being a jerk. Why?<br><br>****************<br><br>[color:blue]VOTE</font color=blue>[color:red] for President George W. Bush on November 2, 2004</font color=red>

No no no. I'm being an [censored], remember.<br><br>

So, in other words, you're unwilling to rise above this kind of crap.<br><br>****************<br><br>[color:blue]VOTE</font color=blue>[color:red] for President George W. Bush on November 2, 2004</font color=red>

The crap heap is at your door, not mine. It's a pattern in a great many of the threads. From argument about trivialities (not always, I grant) to adhomination. There are few things in discussions that get me more upset than adhominem attacks.<br><br>

maybe, but since foreign policy was the topic i'm glad he stuck to it. maybe in town hall these issues might come up, but people want answers to iraq, osama and the economy. the media has to learn that swifties and national guard dont mean squat<br><br>You cant polish a Turd.

<blockquote><font size=1>In reply to:</font><hr><p>maybe, but since foreign policy was the topic i'm glad he stuck to it. maybe in town hall these issues might come up, but people want answers to iraq, osama and the economy. the media has to learn that swifties and national guard dont mean squat<p><hr></blockquote><p>I completely agree. And you're right. It was a Foreign Policy debate ... When Kerry said he defended this country as a young man, I thought that would've been the opening for Lehrer to ask the quesiton, but he stuck to Foreign Policy. <br><br>****************<br><br>[color:blue]VOTE</font color=blue>[color:red] for President George W. Bush on November 2, 2004</font color=red>

<blockquote><font size=1>In reply to:</font><hr><p>The crap heap is at your door, not mine.<p><hr></blockquote><p>Hardly. You're the one squating at the door right now. <br><br><blockquote><font size=1>In reply to:</font><hr><p> It's a pattern in a great many of the threads.<p><hr></blockquote><p>Show me.<br><br><blockquote><font size=1>In reply to:</font><hr><p>From argument about trivialities (not always, I grant) to adhomination.<p><hr></blockquote><p>I participate as vociferously as anyone else in this forum. If I stand on the "wrong" side of your politics, I won't apologize for it. Can you rise above it?<br><br>****************<br><br>[color:blue]VOTE</font color=blue>[color:red] for President George W. Bush on November 2, 2004</font color=red>

Where was the .. you know .. Swift Boat question?<br><br>I was hoping he would have asked that question because Kerry's answer would have ended that smear tactic for the rest of the campaign. Kerry was spot on the entire debate and would have used that question to his own advantage and would have turned it around to make Bush seem only more pathetic. Don't you think Kerry had the attack answer to the Swifties at his fingertips? Matt, did you really want Bush to have to defend his Guard service to the American public that night in the position he was in? Geeez, you should be thanking Jim Lehrer.<br><br>

If I had to make a bet I would bet that the "murderer of 3000 americans" is already dead.<br><br>No sig right now, waiting for the next Kerry flip-flop. .

Me too.<br><br>got to let your eyes adjust