. . . gotten on stage at the DNC and advanced kooky Michael Moore liberal conspiracy theories, nothing . . . n-o-t-h-i-n-g . . . would have been said about his "rage" or anger.<br><br>****************<br><br>[color:blue]VOTE</font color=blue>[color:red] for President George W. Bush on November 2, 2004</font color=red>
_________________________
***************<br><br>This space left intentionally blank
sean
Carpal Tunnel
Registered: 05/21/01
Posts: 8538
Loc: my basement
uh huh.<br><br>"Tribal sovereignty means that, it's sovereign. You're a—you've been given sovereignty, and you're viewed as a sovereign entity. And, therefore, the relationship between the federal government and tribes is one between sovereign entities." dubya 8.6.04
six_of_one
Pool Bar
Registered: 04/19/02
Posts: 4474
Loc: Alexandria, VA
You've got to be kidding! How much heat was there about MM and his "deserter" speech? Or Whoopi's foul-mouthed speech?<br><br>Face it, if Zell had exhibited the same fervor in prime-time Democratic convention coverage, conservative pundits would have slammed him as the quintessential frothing-at-the-mouth liberal, and rightly so ...<br><br>It just so happens he was frothing at the mouth for your guys this time, so they get to take the lumps ;-)<br><br>***matt<br><br>Turn up the signal, wipe out the noise ...