I subscribe to Consumers Reports. In the old days I got the printed form and the yearly books they published. I checked it for every purchase.
That is until they Tested 35mm cameras .
Back in the years from '79 to '94 I taught a community education evening Photo course. My syllabus included the choosing a camera, composition, b&w processing etc. I had students who came to the first class who could barely recognize a camera but at the end were print some really nice stuff.
For my classes, I read every magazine I could get my hands on . I subscribed to several. You might remember in those days there were some respected mags. I was knowledgable on a lot of the cameras that were out. I bought several. At least the ones that my students would get, from yashica, Pentax, Ricoh, Mamiya, Minolta, Canon, Nikon etc. I felt that I could advise them on their purchase as they had to have an manually adjustable camera for my class. A point and shoot would not do.
consumers reports "tested" a big batch of cameras, their "best" was then Pentax Me Super at the time. They raved about it. Now it could take good images, but I ddnt like it much and I had personal experience with it. I had borrowed a friends.
What CU does is that they put a value on certain features. I on the cameras they down played features that I thought were important and up played others that, to me wouldn't have that much value. Of course, this was my points view, but I considered myself well read and knowledgable.
Same with cars. As I recall, at one time they took major concern that the trunk lid was intrusive and that the trunk lip was too high. To me, as inconvenient as these may be, they pale to how the seats feel or that the head room made one scoot down, or that the steering was sloppy.
So here, in this piece , they think the Tesla S I about perfect. They take off one point for the fact that its driving range on a full charge is from 208 to 265 miles. Then it takes 6 hours of 240 volts to recharge.
For a daily commuter or around town this might be acceptable. But, my guess it won't get 208 miles all the time. Usually things like this are not what are posted but in any case 6 hours is a long time. Driving this on a family vacation would certainly be tiresome. 200miles in one day just won't do. I'm 600 miles to Dallas, that's 28 hours averaging 60mph.
It's a magnificent car. Handles great, lots of power good seating, but this one problem needs to be given more importance, not just a single point.
This car would be UN acceptable for me and many others.
Buts that's consumers report. Back in 89 I bought a Ford Bronco II a SUV . CU had just tested it to find that at 35 mph on certain roads, if you cranked it sharply to one side, it might turn over. Sure it might. But don't do that. It's not a small coup. It's a high center of gravity off roading 4WD. For their report, ford had them discounted over $3500. I was pleased. Drove that thing for three years. It handled great. Went off road with it. Never tipped it over. But then I didn't drive it like I drove my 88 Mazda Rx7 turbo.
By the way. I had two Mazda Rx7s. The first one I did turn over. Came to rest in the ditch upsidedown suspended by my seat and lap belts.
There are 10 kinds of people. Those that understand binary and those that don't.
Xplain's use of MacNews, AppleCentral and AppleExpo are not affiliated with Apple, Inc. MacTech is a registered trademark of Xplain Corporation. AppleCentral, MacNews, Xplain, "The journal of Apple technology", Apple Expo, Explain It, MacDev, MacDev-1, THINK Reference, NetProfessional, MacTech Central, MacTech Domains, MacForge, and the MacTutorMan are trademarks or service marks of Xplain Corp. Sprocket is a registered trademark of eSprocket Corp. Other trademarks and copyrights appearing in this printing or software remain the property of their respective holders.
All contents are Copyright 1984-2010 by Xplain Corporation. All rights reserved. Theme designed by Icreon.