Loc: Alexandria, VA
It's not irrelevant. DLC argued that the company was likely to change it's name. I made the point that BP's commitment to the small people was second to none precisely because the company's reputation had a bearing on his prediction.
Well, I think that it would be valid to point out that Union Carbide and Exxon both retained their identity after their horrific debacles. However, it would be equally valid to point out that other companies have in fact changed their names after disastrous events ... so that's probably a toss-up in terms of a convincing harbinger of what may or may not happen with BP moving forward in this instance ...
Using UC and Exxon as a baseline for disaster response is pretty weak, though. Saying that BP's response is "second to none" simply because it sucks less than Union Carbide's or Exxon's isn't really saying a whole lot ...
Using Svanberg's "small people" phrasing is cute, though. More chum makes for tasty chum ;-)
Xplain's use of MacNews, AppleCentral and AppleExpo are not affiliated with Apple, Inc. MacTech is a registered trademark of Xplain Corporation. AppleCentral, MacNews, Xplain, "The journal of Apple technology", Apple Expo, Explain It, MacDev, MacDev-1, THINK Reference, NetProfessional, MacTech Central, MacTech Domains, MacForge, and the MacTutorMan are trademarks or service marks of Xplain Corp. Sprocket is a registered trademark of eSprocket Corp. Other trademarks and copyrights appearing in this printing or software remain the property of their respective holders.
All contents are Copyright 1984-2010 by Xplain Corporation. All rights reserved. Theme designed by Icreon.