Here is Andrew Sullivan's summary.

There are a few points that the court makes that strike directly at some of the bile that Keymaker likes to infer about homosexuals.
Quote:
(2) no other state courts have found orientation relevant to a person's ability to contribute to society and other state statutes treat sexual orientation as irrelevant; (3) sexual orientation is "central to personal identity" and "highly resistance to change"

I agree with Andrew Sullivan that it is preferable for people to give equity to same-sex couples through the legislative process instead of the litigative process, but I love the way that the Iowa court spells the whole thing out in plain language and bases it in human rights.
_________________________
-- Cee Bee Double-U